10.09.2008

rcmp vs insite

In the middle of the last election in Canada, the RCMP publically named a Liberal finance minister in their income-trust investigation. This time around, the RCMP is handling an investigation into serious Conservative ethics breaches "with heightened sensitivities" to "to avoid affecting the outcome of the democratic process".

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that they learned how to keep their mouths shut for the Conservative incumbents but not for the Liberals.

Apparently the RCMP is sensitive to the democratic process, but not to facts and evidence.
The RCMP secretly commissioned research in hopes of discrediting Vancouver's supervised injection site, the Pivot Legal Society says.

The Downtown Eastside advocacy group is claiming the Mounties hired academics to challenge the Insite facility's track record.

Pivot Legal Society lawyer Doug King says it's not the RCMP's job to seek out research on Insite and Pivot has filed a complaint with the federal auditor general, asking for an investigation to determine if the RCMP used public funds to finance the research.

"It's an issue of public health. It's not an issue that falls within the RCMP's gambit," King told the CBC on Tuesday.

King said internal RCMP documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests show the Mounties commissioned at least two academics to dissect research into Insite in hopes of finding flaws.

The facility allows addicts to inject illegal drugs, which they bought on the street, inside under medical supervision. It is funded by the provincial government, and has the support of the city of Vancouver.

And while dozens of studies published in respected journals overwhelmingly showed benefits stemming from Insite, that information didn't appear in the RCMP reports, King said.

King believes an ideological bias motivated the RCMP to play politics with the reports.

"It was really a way for them to attack the science behind Insite without them having the qualifications to do so, and to advance their ideological position."

What can you expect with the Minister of Health himself is more concerned with his definition of morality than with health.

No comments: