8.22.2024

lee zaslofsky, rest in power

This week I learned that a friend and comrade from my Toronto days has died: Lee Zaslofksy. 

Lee was a leader in the War Resisters Support Campaign, supporting men and women who refused to participate in the invasion and occupation of Iraq. For a long time, Lee was the coordinator of the network as it found housing, funds, employment, and community for war resisters coming to Canada. But "coordinator" is a shallow title that doesn't convey what Lee did; his work was much deeper and broader than coordination. Lee supplied friendship and community. He gave of himself. He showed up. He loved.

When you're involved in high-stakes activism, where your work has serious impacts on people lives, people form powerful bonds. You might know very little about someone's background or their day-to-day life, discovering bits of their story as time goes on. Sometimes you might not see or speak with each other in between meetings. Other times you'll speak five times a day. Activist comrades occupy a unique space in your life, different from an ordinary friendship. The passion of your commitment, the depth of your belief, your shared desire to move your cause forward, your deep respect for each other, creates a love that I am grateful to have experienced, more than once in my life. 

Through the War Resisters Support Campaign, I worked with people that I feel incredibly fortunate to have known, so lucky that my life intersected with theirs.

Lee was one of those people to me. Lee will always be on my list of people I am so grateful and fortunate to have known. 

I recall that we didn't always agree on everything, and sometimes differed in our visions of how to move our great project forward. We would become very heated and passionate. I recall him banging the table for emphasis -- and the next time he saw me, hugging me tightly.

Lee was a Vietnam War deserter. He had been a home healthcare aide. He had been a staffer in Jack Layton's office, when Jack was on the Toronto city council. He loved the country of Vietnam, and visited as often as he could, for long periods of time, and had boyfriends there. He was born in Brooklyn, and became a Canadian citizen as soon as he was eligible (as did I).

That might be the sum-total of what I knew about Lee's biography. But I knew much more important things: his principles, his passion for justice, his belief in human potential. His crazy sense of humour, that might elicit anything from an eye-roll to hilarity. The love that poured from him.

His death has hit us all so hard -- all the "resisters and campaigners," we used to say. Now a loose collection of people scattered around North America and beyond, some of us in touch on social media, others not at all, but our bond endures. 

Lee Zaslofsky, rest in power, my friend.

8.17.2024

why i call kamala harris by her last name and wish you would too

Here's a question for progressive folks following the US election campaign: Why do you call Kamala Harris "Kamala" and call Tim Walz "Walz"?

* * * * 

A long time ago, way back in the late 80s, Allan and I would watch a local news broadcast together. We're talking regular TV, "the news" on three times daily -- two local broadcasts (one at 6:00, one at 10:00 or 11:00 pm), and one national broadcast.

During the sports portion of the broadcast, the sports anchor would talk about Mattingly -- Don Mattingly of the New York Yankees, Ewing -- Patrick Ewing, of the New York Knicks, and Chrissie -- tennis great Chris Evert. She wasn't Evert. She was Chrissie.

There were some pioneering broadcasters, notably on ESPN, who broke with this tradition and called female athletes by their last names, but it was unusual, and ESPN was not yet the giant it would later become.

Women's team sports, for the most part, were ignored completely. Big female sports stars were usually called by their first names. Chrissie, Martina, Steffi. Mary Lou. 

The reason for this is simple: sexism. Women's sports were not taken seriously. Calling Chris Evert Chrissie was infantilizing and disrespectful, reflecting the way women's sports were served to the public.

Through the 1990s and 2000s, women's sports grew in stature. The groundbreaking US legislation that mandated funding parity for male and female sports programs -- usually referred to as "Title 9" (Title IX) -- began to bear fruit. Young female athletes received better coaching and had more opportunities. Women's college sports became more visible and more exciting. ESPN broke new ground with a 24-hour sports-news cycle, so they needed more events to cover. That organization also had a progressive mandate to report on sports with less sexism and racism. 

I don't doubt that there are local sportscasters in Texas or Florida -- or hell, in upstate New York or rural Alberta -- that refer to Serena, Simone, or Megan, but at this point, they are likely the exceptions. Sportscasters and sportswriters routinely referring to Williams, Biles, and Rapinoe is a sign of a less sexist view of women's sports.

Can we please apply this to the political sphere?

Surely if we can refer to female athletes by their last names, we can give female candidates for the presidency of the United States the same respect?

During Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaigns, most people referred to her as Hillary. Some said this was to distinguish between Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton. Really? So during the 2016 presidential election campaign, while Hillary Clinton was running against Donald Trump, if we heard the name Clinton, we might think someone was referring to Bill Clinton, who left public office in 2001? 

Another excuse given for calling female candidates by their first names is that we feel like we know them, we believe they are our friends, so we're on a first-name basis with them. Why, then, didn't anyone call Obama Barack? And how can this be said of a woman who so many voters and pundits despise? 

A more likely suspect is the feminist age-gap: why younger women are more likely to change their last names when they marry, why they don't mind being referred to as girls rather than women. I don't get it, but those are personal choices (although with political implications). We're talking about the professional, national, and international stage. Different standards  should apply.

Office workers are still routinely called girls and health-care workers can't seem to make it past ladies. To be clear: these workers refer to themselves and their co-workers as girls and ladies. I've worked in both of these environment (combined) for decades, and the habit seems impervious to change. Every time I hear someone refer to a group of social workers, hospital workers, library workers -- any group of women working in a predominantly female field --  as girls or ladies I want to cry or scream. Or I felt that way when I was younger. Now I just feel the sadness and resignation of defeat. 

Ladies should go the way of mulatto. Lady is not only sexist, but its roots are classist and tied to gender norms -- what was considered "ladylike", i.e. acceptable female behaviour. Someone will point out that the roots of a word are not important if the word is now used in a different context. Then why are we no longer using master bedroom and grandfathered in? Because those expresisons are rooted in slavery. The same applies to ladies, a word rooted in classism. Yet it is so prevalent I despair of it ever changing. 

We are finally seeing gender-neutral terms for various jobs become the norm: writer, actor, lawyer, doctor, athlete, politician, flight attendant, cleaner, housekeeper. Speech patterns are finally reflecting reality: people of different genders do all kinds of jobs. There is no need -- never has been a need -- to qualify a job title with --ess or lady. The job is the job. 

So why is the name not the name?

I don't expect anyone to change their speech habits after reading this post. Perhaps a writer with a wider reach can at least open up the conversation. The candidates are Trump, Vance, Harris, and Walz.

8.11.2024

what i'm reading: path lit by lightning, the life of jim thorpe

Jim Thorpe was one of my fascinations as a child and teen. I spent a lot of time watching old movies on TV, and one day stumbled on "Jim Thorpe: All American," starring Burt Lancaster as Thorpe. I also read from a biography series in my school library, and there was a book on Thorpe. Thorpe was considered the greatest athlete in the world, and he was Native American. I don't know why his story captivated me so. The underdog? The outsider? Indigenous? For whatever reasons, I was star-struck.

My early interest in Indigenous peoples and cultures has lasted a lifetime, as has my abiding interest in the nexus of social issues and sport. So when I saw that David Maraniss had written a biography of Thorpe, I immediately put the title on my list: Path Lit By Lightning: The Life of Jim Thorpe.

It's a masterful work, and also a very sad story. While Thorpe's accomplishments are truly amazing, and should be much more widely known, his life story is more about frustration and loss than about excellence and winning.
Over the years, journalists often portrayed Thorpe as down and out, a shadow of his once grand self, working his way back to a better life from the bottom he hit digging ditches in Los Angeles during the depths of the Depression. It was an understandable if inadequate depiction. The arc of his life after his prime athletic years was less a series of jagged ups and downs than an unceasing exertion against the tide. He had launched so many endeavors in and out of sports, always temporary, always on the move. Hollywood extra. Indian organizer. Seamen. Bar greeter. Banquet speaker. Parks employee. Sports entrepreneur with the Tampa Cardinals in football, the World Famous Indians in basketball, Harjo's Indians in baseball, Jim Thorpe's Thunderbirds in women's softball. [His third wife] Patsy had many more plans for Jim, ranging from a national television show to an agreement to return to pro football with the Philadelphia Eagles, to serving as a pro wrestling manager -- all, they hoped, leading to the ultimate goal of fulfilling Jim's long-held dream of running the Thunderbird Fishing and Hunting Lodge along Florida's Indian River. As usual, most of it would never happen.
Just how good was Thorpe?

In his prime, Thorpe was universally considered the greatest athlete in the world. He ran faster, jumped higher, threw farther, and excelled in more sports than anyone the world had ever seen. He was unquestionably the greatest American football player the world would see for decades, perhaps a century -- possibly ever. He was big and strong, and also light and graceful, winning trophies for ballroom dancing. Thorpe's sports intelligence was so keen that he could watch someone perform a feat or technique once, then effectively imitate it, then best it.

In the 1912 Stockholm Olympics, he won gold medals in both penthalon and decathlon, which then consisted of long jump, javelin throw, 200-meter dash, discus throw, and 1500-meter run. In an incident now famous on social media, someone stole Thorpe's track shoes only moments before the competition. Scrambling, he found two shoes, a mismatched pair -- one retrieved from a trash can -- and won a gold medal wearing those.

After the Olympics, in the Amateur Athletic Union's All-Around Championship -- equivalent to today's world championships in any given sport -- Thorpe won seven of the 10 events he competed in and placed second in the other three, breaking the world record for total points scored. Martin Sheridan, a five-time Olympic gold medalist, was present when his record was broken. He told the press, "Thorpe is the greatest athlete that ever lived. He has me beaten fifty ways. Even when I was in my prime, I could not do what he did today."

I don't watch football (in any of its forms), but reading Maraniss's thrilling descriptions of Thorpe's preternatural ability to avoid tackles, running around, through, and over any opponent in his path, I would give anything to have seen Thorpe play. Sportswriters ran out of superlatives to convey what they had seen.

Here's a view from 1950.
The Associated Press, after polling 391 sportswriters and broadcasters, declared Thorpe "the number one gridiron performer of the last 50 years," as he far outpaced Red Grange and Bronco Nagurski, the only other players in double figures in the voting, followed by Ernie Nevers, Sammy Baugh, Don Hutson , and George Gipp (who had four votes). 
When the same electorate chose the greatest track athlete of the half century, Thorpe finished second behind Jesse Owens. More bests were named in succession in baseball, boxing, basketball, golf, tennis, swimming, and horse racing -- until on February 11, 1950, the AP announced the ultimate crown.

The group of 56 athletes who received at least one vote as greatest athlete of the half century included Willie Hoppe in billiards and Dave Freeman in badminton, but the top 11 formed a gallery of major sports legends. At 11th came the electric Jackie Robinson, in his third year as the pioneer of [B]lack players in the major leagues, with two first-place votes and 24 total points. Next, counting down, came Nagurski at 10th, then Lou Gehrig, Owens, Grange, Joe Lewis, and Bobby Jones, none of whom reached 100 votes. 
For the top four, the numbers jumped exponentially. Ty Cobb had one first-place vote and 148 points for fourth. Jack Dempsey claimed 19 first-place votes and 246 total points for third. Babe Ruth had 86 first-place votes and 539 total points for second.

All overshadowed by the colossus. Jim Thorpe finished with 252 first-place votes and 875 total points.
Disgraced by a disgraceful injustice

In 1913, one year after Thorpe's internationally celebrated success in Stockholm, he was stripped of his titles, and his medals and trophies were confiscated, after it was revealed that Thorpe had played some loosely organized semi-pro baseball. 

Playing bush-league baseball during the summer was a fact of life for hundreds of college athletes. This was technically against the rules, but the rule was rarely, if ever, enforced. Most college athletes would play under a fake name, and officials simply looked away. Thorpe made the "mistake" of using his real name and took no great pains to hide his play. The price for his honesty was catastrophic. The Olympic Committee invalidated Thorpe's wins, and declared the silver medalists the victor.

Protest rang out all over the world. The silver medalists in pentathlon and decathlon, athletes from Norway and Sweden respectively, refused to accept the gold, saying Thorpe had earned it and they had not. Athletes, coaches, fans throughout the world, and the King of Sweden were united in their opposition to the decision. It was not reversed.

Thorpe would press his cause throughout his life, writing letters, speaking to sportswriters, and mentioning it in public appearances, asking for his gold-medal status to be reinstated, and to be given the medals and trophies he had won. 

One man made sure this didn't happen: Avery Brundage.

Nazis and ordinary snakes

Avery Brundage was a powerful Olympic official (and a competitor of Thorpe's) who staunchly defended the elitism of the Olympics. Under his vision, the modern Olympics were a celebration of amateurism -- meaning, people wealthy enough to have copious leisure time, unsullied by the need to support oneself or one's family. He defended this vision at the expense of an incredibly talented, honest, and vulnerable athlete. 

Brundage, not incidentally, was a Nazi. He had a long, glorious career defending racial purity and the murderous, racist regimes that sought to enforce it.

Arguably more devastating than the rescinded gold medals was the betrayal that enabled it. Thorpe's influential coach, Glenn "Pop" Warner, and the head administrator of the Carlisle Indian Boarding School claimed to have no knowledge of Thorpe's baseball play. They took the athlete on whose talents their careers -- and profits -- were built, and threw him under the proverbial bus. They blatantly lied about their knowledge of Thorpe's activity, and feigned shock and outrage, thus saving their own careers and ruining Thorpe's.

The rest is struggle

The rest of Thorpe's life would become a series of struggles, or perhaps one long struggle and a long series of disappointments. People would routinely rip him off. He would go on a baseball barnstorming tour, play all the games, live on a meager allowance, then at the end of the tour, the producer would say, sorry, I have no money to pay you, goodbye. There is story after story like this. Bad investment deals. Grand schemes for a football league. Organizers doling out hope and stringing him along. And always, Thorpe`s generous nature, always wanting to help others, giving away money he himself desperately needed. 

Maraniss writes:
Over the years, journalists often portrayed Thorpe as down and out, a shadow of his once grand self, working his way back to a better life from the bottom he hit digging ditches in Los Angeles during the depths of the depression. It was an understandable if inadequate depiction period the arc of his life after his prime athletic years was less a series of jagged ups and downs than an unceasing exertion against the tide. He had launched so many endeavors in and out of sports, always temporary, always on the move. Hollywood extra. Indian organizer. Seamen. Bar greeter. Banquet speaker. Parks employee. Sports entrepreneur with the Tampa Cardinals in football about that the world famous Indians in basketball, hard joes Indians ing baseball, Jim Thorpe's Thunderbirds in women's softball. Patsy had many more plans for Jim, ranging from a national television show to an agreement to return to Pro Football with the Philadelphia Eagles to serving as a pro wrestling manager dash all, they hoped, leading to the ultimate goal of fulfilling gene gyms long held dream of running the Thunderbird fishing and hunting lodge along Florida's Indian River. As usual, most of it would never happen.

The Hollywood Indians, the Big Chiefs, and the warpath

Thorpe had a minor movie career, at a time when Hollywood was making westerns, in which the Indians were always bad guys, while also promoting the "noble savage" stereotype. It comes as no surprise that the Hollywood Indians, as they were called, were paid less than white actors, and used only as extras. If a movie called for a starring Indian role, it was invariably played by a white actor. This was, of course, a practice that Hollywood employed for decades with leading roles depicting Asians, Latinos, and Native Americans, and has only recently begun to drop, from public pressure.

Thorpe became a spokesperson for Native Americans in the movie business, advising newcomers on how to survive in the business and advocating for Native actors, pushing for them to get their fair due. I had no idea, and I loved this.

If you've never had occasion to read sports pages of old newspapers, you might be shocked at the way the press covered Thorpe. The racist stereotyping is constant and so pervasive, you might think it was a parody. 

Native American athletes were always called Chief, and said to be "on the warpath". Headlines routinely read "Big Chief Thorpe Runs Heap-um Fast", "Injun Thorpe Say You No Catch Me," and similar. 

Having read a lot of this kind of thing over time, I was not surprised. When Joe DiMaggio signed with the New York Yankees, sportswriters gleefully told their readers DiMaggio hardly smelled like garlic at all. Seriously. These "jokes" never stopped. There were pitifully few instances of game stories or features about Thorpe that did not contain these racist stereotypes. His greatest champion in the press, the talented and famous Grantland Rice, wrote seriously and beautifully about Thorpe. But even Rice employed the accepted wisdom of the day, that Thorpe was the last of a "dying race," childlike in his innocence.

Crossing many paths

Thorpe didn't lead an exemplary life. He struggled with alcohol and relationships. In that, he was no different than millions of others, and he had the additional burden of racism and discrimination. Thorpe lost his twin brother when he was a little boy, and his first child to the influenza pandemic. There was a lot of sadness and loss in his life.

Thorpe's career intersected with many people who would later become famous. He demolished both George S. Patton and Dwight D. Eisenhower on the football field, he batte against the great Walter Johnson, he was friends with Babe Ruth (he and Thorpe had much in common), and was befriended and aided by Bob Hope. Maraniss skillfully uses each encounter to illuminate facets of Thorpe's personality and talents.

Maraniss has an excellent take on Native American issues. Living at the Carlisle Indian Boarding School worked out well for Thorpe, not unlike how St. Mary's Industrial School for Boys worked out for Babe Ruth. But Maraniss doesn't use this to mount a specious argument on the effectiveness of the Indian Boarding Schools. He is very clear on what was going on -- the destruction of families and culture, the infantilizing of adults (Native Americans were forced to petition Indian Agents to access their own money), the forced assimilation, the school conditions that were ripe for, and rife with, abuse.

Here's an interesting and maddening note.
Ten days before Christmas, a letter arrived from Horace J. Johnson, chief agent at the Sac and Fox Agency in Stroud. One document inside proclaimed that James Francis Thorpe had qualified to be deemed a United States citizen. He was 29. He had lived his entire life on American soil. He was educated at government schools. He could read and write. He had brought glory to the United States as the greatest athlete at the Olympics in 1912, praised by President Taft for representing "the best type of American citizen". His income as a professional baseball and football player exceeded the $3,000-a-year minimum that required him to pay federal taxes. All of that, yet only now was he granted citizenship.
* * * *

Many years ago, I put Maraniss's book They Marched Into Sunlight on my List. Looking over the list for our recent pilgrimage to Powell's in Portland, I thought, do I still want to read this? Nah. I moved the title into the "no longer want to read" section. (No deleting!) Now that I've read Path Lit by Lightning, my interest in that earlier book is renewed. Maraniss has also written a biography of Roberto Clemente, among many other works,

I will also note that Path Lit by Lightning reminded me greatly of my partner Allan's first book, 1918: Babe Ruth and the World Champion Boston Red Sox. 1918 has a shorter time-span and narrower focus, but the two books and the writing styles have a lot in common. Maraniss's play-by-play of football games is almost as good as Allan's recreation of baseball games from those long-ago days.

If you're all tl;dr about my blog, this excellently written review of Path Lit by Lightning by Keith Olbermann is really worth reading.