Dennis Kyne put up such a fight at a political protest last summer, the arresting officer recalled, it took four police officers to haul him down the steps of the New York Public Library and across Fifth Avenue.Full story here. Thanks, Mayor Bloomberg. You helped keep the Republicans safe, and the hotels full. Too bad only Republicans will vote for your reelection.
"We picked him up and we carried him while he squirmed and screamed," the officer, Matthew Wohl, testified in December. "I had one of his legs because he was kicking and refusing to walk on his own."
Accused of inciting a riot and resisting arrest, Mr. Kyne was the first of the 1,806 people arrested in New York last summer during the Republican National Convention to take his case to a jury. But one day after Officer Wohl testified, and before the defense called a single witness, the prosecutor abruptly dropped all charges.
During a recess, the defense had brought new information to the prosecutor. A videotape shot by a documentary filmmaker showed Mr. Kyne agitated but plainly walking under his own power down the library steps, contradicting the vivid account of Officer Wohl, who was nowhere to be seen in the pictures. Nor was the officer seen taking part in the arrests of four other people at the library against whom he signed complaints.
A sprawling body of visual evidence, made possible by inexpensive, lightweight cameras in the hands of private citizens, volunteer observers and the police themselves, has shifted the debate over precisely what happened on the streets during the week of the convention.
For Mr. Kyne and 400 others arrested that week, video recordings provided evidence that they had not committed a crime or that the charges against them could not be proved, according to defense lawyers and prosecutors.
For those who don't recognize the title of this entry, it's a brilliant bit of writing from 1791, known as the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.And if that doesn't work, move to Canada.
2 comments:
I don't know about you, but this is absolutely rediculous.
And what this story doesn't talk about is what happened to the police officer who registered the complaint against the individual. I don't know about in the states, but in Canada making a false statement in a criminal court is a very serious crime. Especially when done by an offier of the peace.
Peter
It's ridiculous, it's illegal, and it's unconsititutional.
It's also incredibly frustrating, as engaging in peaceful protest - or for that matter, picking up some sushi while a protest happens to be going on! - should not be a scary, risky, dangerous event. These people were held in jail cells, fined, mistreated - and they did nothing wrong!
If I find out that anything happens to the arresting officer, I'll update. Until then, it's safe to assume not a damn thing will happen, since he was "just following orders".
Post a Comment