I just heard that my beloved great aunt passed away.
As many of you know, this is the tough part of long-distance. Jewish funerals are immediately after the death, so there's no way I can make it to the funeral. Whether or not I can make a shiva call - the Jewish post-funeral period of family visitation and mourning - I don't know.
Lillian was my grandmother's youngest sister, the last surviving of five siblings. She and I had a special relationship. We were "pen pals" (what an old expression!) when I was 8, 9, 10 years old, writing letters back and forth between Brooklyn and the New York suburbs.
And we stayed close over the years. It was just a special thing we had.
I find Lillian's death especially sad because in her last years, she was very depressed. She withdrew from everybody except her daughter and her sister Ida, with whom she lived at a senior home. When Ida died five years ago, Lillian withdrew from everybody. Allan and I used to visit them once or twice a year, but in recent years she refused to see us. We wanted to visit before we moved to Canada, but she wouldn't let us come out. I still called her and wrote to her. In fact, I just mailed a letter yesterday, one she'll never see.
She was 91. I'll miss her.
* * * *
This morning when I posted this, I was too sad to think of anything positive. A few hours later, plus a comment from a thoughtful friend, and I am remembering happy times with Aunt Lillian.
Lillian was a creative, artistic person. She would have liked the opportunity to go to art school when she was younger. As an adult, that wasn't something she would give to herself. She painted copies of famous paintings that she framed and hung in her home, joking that they were authentic fakes.
The creativity Lillian was best known for were her hand-made cards. For birthdays, anniversaries, graduations and any other special occasion, she would make her own cards. She'd cut out a cardboard square - my grandmother saved the cardboard that came in my grandfather's shirts from the laundry - and paint a little scene relevant to the occasion.
They were always humourous, full of inside jokes about the person. On my grandparents' anniversary, my grandmother, a neat freak, would be dusting my grandfather's head. There would be travel brochures on a table and suitcases by a door, since they traveled the world together.
Cards for me and Allan had dogs in them, and baseball caps, and maybe music playing, or we might be going to a club to hear music. My birthday cards often had me at a typewriter. My mother would be knitting.
These cards were always so clever and cute. We looked forward to seeing what she'd put on them every year.
I have at least a dozen of Aunt Lillian's cards, probably more, stowed in the shoeboxes that are the archives of my life. Here's one Allan found in a box. I think the wish refers to Allan's writing, trying to get wider recognition, and the double meaning of the dogs not being in their place - an ongoing issue she heard a lot about!
That's Gypsy and Clyde, our first two dogs. I think I'm yelling at the dogs! Not very nice!
12.20.2008
there is no centre ground when it comes to equal rights
I have a letter in today's Globe and Mail.
The bullshit I was responding to is here.
I remember when Bill Clinton was first elected in 1992, how thrilled we were that the Reagan-Bush era was over, how hopeful we were for change. Fellow activists who were older than us were more muted. I remember a friend saying, "I'm very happy that Bush is out of a job, but I don't expect much to change."
Then in his first weeks in office, seemingly one day after the next, Clinton betrayed us. Haitian refugees, gays in the military, anti-choice judicial appointments. And that was before NAFTA and welfare. It wasn't that Clinton himself was particularly duplicitous. But he was a standard-issue Democrat, doing what Democrats do.
I hope everyone's hopes do better under Obama, but it isn't looking very promising.
John Ibbitson writes that Barack Obama's choice of Rick Warren to deliver an invocation at his inauguration reflects Mr. Obama's efforts "to craft an administration that hews to the centre." This implies that same-sex marriage is an extreme position, pitting anti-gay right-wingers against a radical left.
But equality under the law is not a radical idea or a leftist idea. Equality under the law is supposed to be a bedrock value of the United States. There is no centre ground when it comes to equal rights. One either has them or one does not.
The bullshit I was responding to is here.
I remember when Bill Clinton was first elected in 1992, how thrilled we were that the Reagan-Bush era was over, how hopeful we were for change. Fellow activists who were older than us were more muted. I remember a friend saying, "I'm very happy that Bush is out of a job, but I don't expect much to change."
Then in his first weeks in office, seemingly one day after the next, Clinton betrayed us. Haitian refugees, gays in the military, anti-choice judicial appointments. And that was before NAFTA and welfare. It wasn't that Clinton himself was particularly duplicitous. But he was a standard-issue Democrat, doing what Democrats do.
I hope everyone's hopes do better under Obama, but it isn't looking very promising.
Labels:
bigotry,
equal marriage,
lgbt stuff,
my writing,
us politics
12.19.2008
news release from winnipeg: stephen harper is a hypocrite
Update. We originally heard that war resister Cliff Cornell received a deportation date of December 24. This afternoon we learned that Cliff's deportation date was today. His lawyer went to court to try to win a deferral, so he can finish his appeals process. No word yet if those efforts were successful.
As of right now, Cliff is still in Canada. I will update when I hear anything more.
News release from the Peace Alliance of Winnipeg.
As of right now, Cliff is still in Canada. I will update when I hear anything more.
News release from the Peace Alliance of Winnipeg.
Subject: News Release: Harper government denies war resisters' rights to safe haven while Harper turns the sod at the Canadian Museum of Human Rights
(Winnipeg, December 19, 2008) On the day that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is turning the sod at the Canadian Museum of Human Rights in Winnipeg, his government is forcibly deporting American war resister Clifford Cornell.
Despite Mr. Harper's pretensions as a patron of human rights, his government has completely ignored a motion, passed by Parliament June 3, 2008, that called on the Canadian government to allow US war resisters to apply for permanent resident status in Canada and to cease all deportation and removal proceedings against US war resisters.
His refusal to allow war resisters a safe haven in Canada reverses a proud Canadian tradition of providing conscientious objectors a refuge from militarism, one recently reaffirmed in a June 2008 Angus Reid poll which showed that 64% of Canadians support allowing war resisters to stay in Canada.
Prime Minister Harper admitted during the last election that the Iraq war, one he had earlier championed, was "absolutely an error." Yet his refusal to grant safe haven to that war shows that Mr. Harper supports what most international legal experts regard to be an illegal invasion and occupation that has led to the death of perhaps 1.2 million Iraqis and the displacement of another four million. His determination to punish U.S. War resisters by deporting them to the U.S. where they face imprisonment is hypocritical, to say the least.
Since Parliament passed its motion to allow war resisters to remain in Canada, the Federal Court has issued stays of removal to war resisters Jeremy Hinzman, Patrick Hart, Corey Glass and Matt Lowell. This will allow them additional time to make their cases to remain in Canada.
However, Robin Long, deported earlier this year, was sentenced on August 22, to 15 months in prison at a military penitentiary. War resister Dean Walcott was told on December 3rd that he must leave Canada by January 6th or face deportation to the United States. Another war resister, Kimberly Rivera, will receive a decision on her request to remain in Canada on Jan. 7. As noted earlier, Clifford Cornell is scheduled for deportation today. (Earlier reports said he would be deported on Christmas Eve.)
Peace Alliance Winnipeg (PAW) calls upon all who believe that conscientious objection to an illegal, immoral war is a human right to voice their opinions to the federal government.
PAW asks citizens to contact Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Jason Kenney at (613) 954-1064 or (613) 992-2235 or minister@cic.gc.ca or Kenney.j@parl.gc.ca.
Please cc the opposition party critics if you email Jason Kenney:
• Liberal party immigration critic Borys Wrzesnewskyj: wrzesnewskyj.b@parl.gc.ca
• NDP immigration critic Olivia Chow: chow.o@parl.gc.ca
• Bloc Québécois immigration critic Thierry St-Cyr: st-cyr.t@parl.gc.ca.
Finally, visit the websites of War Resisters Support Campaign and Peace Alliance Winnipeg to see how you can become further involved.
b.c. wages brutal, senseless - and secret - war on wolves
This makes me so sad. It's so wrong - and so completely unnecessary. A disgrace.
Thanks to Mark Hume for this story.
It's a dirty business killing wolves and the British Columbia government would rather the public didn't think about it much.
Reports on how many wolves are being shot, trapped, sterilized, and otherwise hounded out of existence under predator-control programs in beautiful B.C. aren't readily available. When they do occasionally surface, it is a reminder of just how grim the battle is that is being waged out there against wolves.
Anne Sherrod, a researcher with Valhalla Wilderness Watch, was recently leaked a government PowerPoint presentation on a wolf-control program being conducted by the Ministry of Environment.
The document shows that between 2001 and 2004, as part of an effort to save endangered mountain caribou, the government killed 30 wolves and sterilized 16 others in the Quesnel Highlands area in central B.C.
Ms. Sherrod said the government report refers to "live trapping" wolves, but what that term really means is the wolves are caught in leghold traps. They aren't alive for long, and as a Creston man recently found out when his dog stepped in two wolf traps - the death is agonizing.
The government did take some wolves alive using net guns during its Quesnel Highlands wolf project, and 27 of those animals were fitted with radio collars.
The signals transmitted from those collars allow government officials to track the wolves from aircraft, to shoot members of the pack if they want, or to log their movements and see how often they overlap with caribou herds.
Not surprisingly, the radio study has shown that wolves and caribou often cross each other's tracks.
It isn't known, however, how often wolves actually kill caribou. It may be rare.
But that hasn't stopped the B.C. government from making wolves open targets in areas where endangered herds of mountain caribou are found.
"In the Quesnel Highlands, they have been killing the sub-alpha wolves and sterilizing the alpha males and females," Ms. Sherrod said. "This doesn't make any environmental sense. ... Animals like caribou have to have habitat to survive and if they don't have that habitat because of logging and other development, then shooting the predators won't save them."
Ms. Sherrod said lots of researchers have looked at the relationship between wolves and mountain caribou.
But so far nobody has turned up any hard evidence to show that wolves have any significant impact on mountain caribou populations.
Certainly any hungry wolf that got a chance would take down a caribou. But the highly mobile caribou herds are so small and so widely spread, it may be that wolves just don't feed on them very much.
But killing wolves is something that's been in the B.C. government's blood for a long time. While trappers, hunters and ranchers have done a good job of controlling local populations, the government has several times sanctioned large-scale control programs. In the fifties, bounties were offered, and in the sixties, the government was doing aerial drops of poisoned baits. Those programs ended because of public protests, but the government seems to be quietly moving in that direction again.
"We don't fully know what's going on because the information just isn't available," Ms. Sherrod said.
"But what we do know about wolf-control programs is that the killing has to be massive and prolonged if you really want to wipe out wolves," she said.
"What happens when you first start killing them is that the pack compensates by increasing the birth rate. They have more pups. The packs scatter. And so you end up with more wolves in more places."
Ms. Sherrod says when that happens, the predator-control experts argue for an increased kill, to stop the infestation from spreading.
"What we have seen happen is that wolf-control programs get more brutal and unrelenting as they go along," Mr. Sherrod said. "When predator-control programs start, one way or another they eventually devolve to the worst level. We've seen wolf poisoning in the past in B.C. and I fear that sooner or later, that's where we'll end up again."
If that happens it may be a while before the public learns about it - because, in B.C., not much is said about the killing of wolves.
Thanks to Mark Hume for this story.
Labels:
animals (other than dogs),
environment,
wolves
victory for debbie shank
Activism works, especially when it causes a lot of bad publicity. Perhaps you recall the story of Debbie Shank; I blogged about it here and here. Shank is a former Wal-Mart employee, now permanently disabled and brain-damaged, and living in a nursing home. After her family won a small settlement to help pay for her care, Wal-Mart sued them for that claim.
It takes Wal-Mart all of 38 seconds to earn the $470,000 that they spent on Shank's care. But they sued her husband to get that money back - and they got away with it.
From Wal-Mart Watch:
In Canada, employees at the Wal-Mart in Weyburn, Saskatchewan were granted union status on December 8, but knowing Wal-Mart's history, it's unclear how long that status - or their jobs - will last.
As always, Wal-Mart Watch is the best source of news on the battles to hold North America's largest employer accountable for labour, environment, health care and the communities it claims to serve.
It takes Wal-Mart all of 38 seconds to earn the $470,000 that they spent on Shank's care. But they sued her husband to get that money back - and they got away with it.
From Wal-Mart Watch:
It took a massive media outcry and the voices of thousands of Americans, but Wal-Mart has finally taken a small step in the right direction with a change to its 2009 health care plan, which should prevent the company from putting another family through the agony it put Debbie Shank's family.
The new rule is an exception to the company's right to subrogate against a covered person completely in cases of 1) paraplegia or quadriplegia; 2) severe burns; 3) total and permanent physical or mental disability; or 4) death. In all other cases, the plan also limits the right to recover to 50% (from 100% previously) of a settlement plus lawyers' fees.
You may recall that it was only months ago that Wal-Mart was battling in court to take money that one of its former Missouri employees -- Debbie Shank -- won in a settlement after being hit by a tractor trailer and becoming paralyzed and permanently brain damaged.
Now, thanks to your efforts, the company is promising its employees that it won't attempt to take their money after a personal health care tragedy like hers. Wal-Mart still has a very long way to go toward offering its employees truly quality health coverage, but it's a good first step.
Jim Shank had this to say about the news of Wal-Mart's change to their health care plan:
"Knowing what Debbie and our family experienced with Wal-Mart's attempts to take away Debbie's financial security for her ongoing medical care on top of a very real, life-changing tragedy, I am grateful that the focus on our situation will spare other families the same type of suffering. I wish it wouldn't have taken national outrage to push Wal-Mart to do the right thing, but I'm glad that the company listened to everyone who spoke up on our behalf."
Tens of thousands of you took action and urged Wal-Mart to treat Debbie and her compassionately. Without your hard work, Wal-Mart certainly would not have changed its policy.
While we still have much to do to make sure that Wal-Mart provides its employees with adequate health care coverage, this was a big victory that would not have been possible without your help.
Thank you for pressuring Wal-Mart to be a responsible corporate citizen.
In Canada, employees at the Wal-Mart in Weyburn, Saskatchewan were granted union status on December 8, but knowing Wal-Mart's history, it's unclear how long that status - or their jobs - will last.
As we know, in 2000 when Wal-Mart meat department employees unionized in Jacksonville, Texas, Wal-Mart abruptly scrapped their entire network of in store butchers. [Occupational Health & Safety, 3/16/08]
In August 2004, workers in Jonquière, Quebec store gained union certification and attempted to bargain with Wal-Mart but were unable to reach a settlement. On February 1, 2005, the same day that the Minster of Labor granted the union's request for contract arbitration, Wal-Mart announced that it would close the Jonquière store. [Human Rights Watch "Discounting Rights", May 2007] [Go here for full story and links.]
As always, Wal-Mart Watch is the best source of news on the battles to hold North America's largest employer accountable for labour, environment, health care and the communities it claims to serve.
Labels:
activism,
health care,
labour,
poverty and class
some things you can do to help stop deportations of iraq war resisters
Iraq War resister Cliff Cornell has been given a deportation date of December 24, 2008.
War resister Kimberly Rivera will receive a decision on her Humanitarian and Compassionate Application and Pre-Removal Risk Assessment on January 7.
War resister Patrick Hart and his family are scheduled for deportation on January 15.
War resister Dean Walcott is scheduled for deportation on January 30.
Here are some things you can do to raise your voice in protest, and to show solidarity and support for Cliff, Kim, Patrick, Dean and all the other Iraq War resisters in Canada.
1. Everyone:
Send a holiday greeting to Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney!
Tell him to respect the will of Parliament, which passed a motion in June calling on the government to cease all deportation proceedings against war resisters and to allow them to stay legally in Canada. Tell him you want a Canada that respects democracy and welcomes people of peace and conscience!
Copy the Immigration critics and the War Resisters Support Campaign.
To: Jason Kenney: minister@cic.gc.ca or kenney.j@parl.gc.ca
cc: Borys Wrzesnewskyj: wrzesnewskyj.b@parl.gc.ca
cc: Olivia Chow: chow.o@parl.gc.ca
cc: Thierry St-Cyr: st-cyr.t@parl.gc.ca
cc: War Resisters Support Campaign: resisters@sympatico.ca
2. Everyone, but especially supporters in BC:
Write letters to your local media! Make sure voices of peace are heard.
The 3 main points to cover are:
Letters can be sent to:
- letters@theherald.canwest.com
in response to this article in the Calgary Herald,
- provletters@theprovince.com in response to this article in The Province,
- kreid@stcatharinesstandard.ca and akriluck@stcatharinesstandard.ca in response to this article in the St. Catherine Standard,
- letters@globeandmail.com in response to this story in the Globe and Mail, and
- letters@straight.com in response to this story in the Georgia Straight.
3. Supporters in Toronto:
Here's a letter from the Campaign. If you're in Toronto on December 23, perhaps you'll take a half-hour to stand up for peace.
Dear Friends --
"And she brought forth her first-born son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger BECAUSE THERE WAS NO ROOM IN THE INN" -- Luke 2:7
Please join us for a brief Holiday Vigil to protest the imminent deportations of war resisters Cliff Cornell and Kim Rivera, and to show our support for a vigil that will take place that day in San Diego, CA in support of jailed war resister Robin Long.
DATE: Tuesday, December 23
TIME: 4:30 to 5:00 p.m.
PLACE: Across from the US Consulate, corner of Armoury and University, 1 block north of Queen Street West, 1 block south of Dundas Street West
Background:
This holiday season has been clouded by the actions of our government as they try to hound the war resisters out of Canada.
Cliff Cornell and Kim Rivera and her family are the latest of a number of war resisters who have been, or will soon be, ordered out of Canada, so they can be punished in the US. Robin Long was deported in July, and is now serving a 15-month jail sentence.
Cliff Cornell came to Canada in 2005 to avoid serving in a war he never enlisted to fight. He joined the US Army in 2002, attracted by the $6000 bonus offered him by a recruiter. When the US invaded Iraq in 2003, Cliff looked into the reasons for the war. By 2005 he was convinced that it was illegal and immoral. Cliff lives in Gabriola Island, BC. He has been ordered to leave Canada by Christmas Eve, or be forcibly deported face punishment in the US.
Kim Rivera came to Canada with her husband Mario and their two children, Christian and Rebecca, in February 2007. She enlisted to get access to a steady salary, housing and health care for her family. She was told that, as a wife and mother, she would not be in a combat role. But she was sent to Iraq in 2006, and was assigned to a Forward Observation Post exposed to daily rocket attacks. On leave back in the US, she and her husband decided to come to Canada. On November 23, 2008, Kim gave birth to her third child, Katie. The Riveras will learn on January 7 whether they too will face deportation, so Kim can be punished in the US.
The Harper Government keeps trying to deport the war resisters. Cliff and Kim are only the most recent war resisters to be lined up for deportation. Others in the lineup are Jeremy Hinzman and his family, Patrick Hart and his family, Matt Lowell, and Dean Walcott.
Our vigil will call on the Harper government to stop the deportations immediately. We will also call on the government to implement the motion adopted by the House of Commons last June, recommending that the war resisters be allowed to stay in Canada, and that all deportation proceedings against them be stopped.
Please join us in a Holiday Season Vigil to say "THERE MUST ALWAYS BE ROOM IN CANADA FOR THOSE WHO RESIST ILLEGAL WARS, AND COME HERE TO SEEK PEACE"
Thank you to the Vancouver chapter of the War Resisters Support Campaign for the graphic.
Labels:
activism,
canadian culture,
canadian politics,
war resisters
12.18.2008
attention winnipeggers
Winnipeggers: A certain Prime Minister, sans sweater vest, but avec Fisher Price hair, will be in your fair city for several events tomorrow.
At 11:30 a.m., Stephen Harper will deliver brief remarks at the groundbreaking ceremony of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights (The Forks). At 2:45 pm he will participate in a business round-table (Delta Hotel, 350 St. Mary Ave).
Just in case you want to say hi!
At 11:30 a.m., Stephen Harper will deliver brief remarks at the groundbreaking ceremony of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights (The Forks). At 2:45 pm he will participate in a business round-table (Delta Hotel, 350 St. Mary Ave).
Just in case you want to say hi!
tragedies in oshawa
Yesterday a fire swept through the Durham Humane Society in Oshawa, Ontario, killing (depending on which report is accurate) as many as 200 animals. Most of the animals that died - at least 140 - were cats, along with a few dogs and many smaller animals like hamsters and guinea pigs.
Rescue workers managed to save nine dogs and two cats.
The most tragic aspect is how avoidable this was. If everyone was responsible about spaying and neutering their animals - and if free or low-cost neutering was readily available - there would be no over-crowded animal shelters in the first place.
My heart goes out to the shelter workers, who must be traumatized and bereft. I have always been terrified of my animals being trapped in a fire, especially when we lived in an apartment building, where residents may not be as careful about fire as I am. I can scarcely imagine how people cope with a loss of this magnitude.
Truly, my heart goes out to the whole community of Oshawa. They're suffering from massive unemployment from auto plant closings. Two weeks ago there was a horrific attack that killed both parents and one son at a child's birthday party. And now hundreds of needy animals have been killed.
To donate to the the Durham Humane Society, go here.
For information on how to help the surviving members of the Kelly family, go here.
To help the struggling auto workers, get rid of Stephen Harper.
Rescue workers managed to save nine dogs and two cats.
The most tragic aspect is how avoidable this was. If everyone was responsible about spaying and neutering their animals - and if free or low-cost neutering was readily available - there would be no over-crowded animal shelters in the first place.
My heart goes out to the shelter workers, who must be traumatized and bereft. I have always been terrified of my animals being trapped in a fire, especially when we lived in an apartment building, where residents may not be as careful about fire as I am. I can scarcely imagine how people cope with a loss of this magnitude.
Truly, my heart goes out to the whole community of Oshawa. They're suffering from massive unemployment from auto plant closings. Two weeks ago there was a horrific attack that killed both parents and one son at a child's birthday party. And now hundreds of needy animals have been killed.
To donate to the the Durham Humane Society, go here.
For information on how to help the surviving members of the Kelly family, go here.
To help the struggling auto workers, get rid of Stephen Harper.
Labels:
animals (other than dogs),
canadian culture,
dogs
send holiday wishes to jason kenney
Last week, I told you that war resister Cliff Cornell has received a deportation date of December 24. Yes, it's true, the grinchy government will remove this peaceful, productive resident of Canada on Christmas Eve, so he can spend Christmas day in a U.S. military prison.
Yesterday, the campaign issued a press release about Cliff, and we got good response from the mainstream media.
As the story says, my friend Kimberly Rivera, one of a few female war resisters in Canada, will receive the final decision in her appeal to stay on January 7. We expect to add Kim's name to the ever-growing list of deportation orders.
Kim has been living in the Parkdale section of Toronto with her husband and two children since 2006 - except now they are a family of five, as Kim gave birth to Katie Marie at the end of November.
So, in early January, we expect the Harper Government to issue a deportation order against a nursing mother with a new infant. Kim's only "crime" is that she saw the true face of the US occupation of Iraq, and she chose peace.
Is this the kind of Canada we want?
None of these deportations need to take place. The presence of a few peaceful, working, legal residents of Canada hurts no one. At the very least, we need all deportations to cease until Jeremy Hinzman's appeal is heard on February 10.
The War Resisters Support Campaign is calling on our supporters to send a holiday greeting to Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney. If you celebrate Christmas, perhaps you will refer to another new mother, a woman who was "great with child," and for whom "there was no room at the inn".
Your holiday email to Mr. Kenney can be very brief, and it should be respectful. Tell him to Let Them Stay!
Please also cc the Citizenship and Immigration critics, along with the Campaign.
TO: Jason Kenney: minister@cic.gc.ca or kenney.j@parl.gc.ca
CC: Borys Wrzesnewskyj: wrzesnewskyj.b@parl.gc.ca
CC: Olivia Chow: chow.o@parl.gc.ca
CC: Thierry St-Cyr: st-cyr.t@parl.gc.ca
CC: War Resisters Support Campaign: resisters@sympatico.ca
Feel free to post your email in comments here, so other readers can get some ideas. Thank you!
Yesterday, the campaign issued a press release about Cliff, and we got good response from the mainstream media.
The War Resisters Support Campaign says Citizenship and Immigration Canada has told a U.S. deserter living in Nanaimo, B.C., that he must leave Canada by Dec. 24 or face removal by force.
Cliff Cornell, originally from Arkansas, arrived in Canada in January, 2005. He currently works as an assistant manager of a retail store near Nanaimo.
Mr. Cornell's deportation order comes after similar orders for war resisters Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman and his family, Patrick Hart and his family, Matt Lowell and Dean Walcott.
The group says in a release that another, Kim Rivera, will receive a decision on Jan. 7. Ms. Rivera served with the U.S. Army in Iraq and came to Canada with her husband, Mario, and their two children in early 2007.
The War Resisters Support Campaign said it is calling on the federal government to implement a motion adopted by Parliament on June 3, 2008.
The motion recommended that "conscientious objectors to wars not sanctioned by the Security Council of the United Nations" be allowed to remain in Canada and apply for permanent resident status.
It was adopted by a vote of 137-110 and also directed the government to stop deportation proceedings against war resisters and deserters living in Canada.
The Federal Court is to hear an appeal by Jeremy Hinzman against his deportation order on Feb. 10, 2009.
"Minister Jason Kenney should stop all deportations, at least until the Federal Court has completed the Hinzman appeal," said Lee Zaslofsky, co-ordinator of the War Resisters Support Campaign. "It would be a travesty if war resisters were deported, especially over the holidays, only to have the court find that they should be given another chance to apply to stay in Canada."
As the story says, my friend Kimberly Rivera, one of a few female war resisters in Canada, will receive the final decision in her appeal to stay on January 7. We expect to add Kim's name to the ever-growing list of deportation orders.
Kim has been living in the Parkdale section of Toronto with her husband and two children since 2006 - except now they are a family of five, as Kim gave birth to Katie Marie at the end of November.
So, in early January, we expect the Harper Government to issue a deportation order against a nursing mother with a new infant. Kim's only "crime" is that she saw the true face of the US occupation of Iraq, and she chose peace.
Is this the kind of Canada we want?
None of these deportations need to take place. The presence of a few peaceful, working, legal residents of Canada hurts no one. At the very least, we need all deportations to cease until Jeremy Hinzman's appeal is heard on February 10.
The War Resisters Support Campaign is calling on our supporters to send a holiday greeting to Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney. If you celebrate Christmas, perhaps you will refer to another new mother, a woman who was "great with child," and for whom "there was no room at the inn".
Your holiday email to Mr. Kenney can be very brief, and it should be respectful. Tell him to Let Them Stay!
Please also cc the Citizenship and Immigration critics, along with the Campaign.
TO: Jason Kenney: minister@cic.gc.ca or kenney.j@parl.gc.ca
CC: Borys Wrzesnewskyj: wrzesnewskyj.b@parl.gc.ca
CC: Olivia Chow: chow.o@parl.gc.ca
CC: Thierry St-Cyr: st-cyr.t@parl.gc.ca
CC: War Resisters Support Campaign: resisters@sympatico.ca
Feel free to post your email in comments here, so other readers can get some ideas. Thank you!
12.17.2008
what's missing here?
Redsock guest post - L.
Something is missing from this news story. I wonder what it could be...
* * * *
I first saw this a few days ago at Fox News (the link is now dead), but it's actually an Associated Press story. Just another example (one of tens of thousands) of the utter worthlessness of the US media.
But wait! The sixth paragraph begins:
Fair and Balanced.
Something is missing from this news story. I wonder what it could be...
Time Running Out for Obama to Curb Global Warming
The urgency of problems related to global warming are increasing at a rapid pace and will no doubt prove to be a matter of urgency for President-elect Barack Obama.
WASHINGTON -- When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Now it is a ticking time bomb that President-elect Barack Obama can't avoid.
Since Clinton's inauguration, summer Arctic sea ice has lost the equivalent of Alaska, California and Texas. The 10 hottest years on record have occurred since Clinton's second inauguration. Global warming is accelerating. Time is close to running out, and Obama knows it. ...
The average global temperature in 2008 is likely to wind up slightly under 57.9 degrees Fahrenheit, about a tenth of a degree cooler than last year. When Clinton was inaugurated, 57.9 easily would have been the warmest year on record. Now, that temperature would qualify as the ninth warmest year.
* * * *
I first saw this a few days ago at Fox News (the link is now dead), but it's actually an Associated Press story. Just another example (one of tens of thousands) of the utter worthlessness of the US media.
But wait! The sixth paragraph begins:
After years of inaction on global warming, 2009 might be different. Obama replaces a president who opposed mandatory cuts of greenhouse gas pollution and it appears he will have a willing Congress.
Fair and Balanced.
moral relativism taken to dangerous extremes
Yesterday the Globe and Mail ran an editorial titled "A Disgrace to Journalism". It began:
It goes on to say that "to its shame," Al Baghdadia, Al-Zaidi's employer, is defending him, and "to their shame," organizations like Reporters Without Borders did not "condemn the attempted assault".
While this is not surprising, I find it no less wrong-headed and maddening. As we see all too often in our society, order and decorum are what matter most. When millions of people take to the streets to protest an immoral war, what matters is whether or not the protesters were peaceful and how many people were arrested. The violence, destruction and injustice being perpetrated by the state are secondary. How did the crowd express its anger? Was order kept? Did they behave politely?
I can't blame this on the mainstream media, as in this case it reflects what too many people believe and have been conditioned to react. In comments on my original post about the shoe-throwing, I learned that "two wrongs don't make a right" has become a standard response to the incident.
This is the same moral illogic that says war is wrong, but war resisters should be punished because they signed a contract. It's the same moral illogic that condemned human rights protesters when they dared to disrupt the Olympic torch relay.
What is this "order" so many people hold so dear? Sometimes it's fear. Capitulation. Submission. Sometimes it's allowing the state to be more important than the people who it purports to represent.
Here are some replies to the G&M editorial that ran today.
The journalist who threw his shoes at U.S. President George W. Bush is being hailed as a hero by some Iraqis, but he is a disgrace to his profession and should be fired by his employer. The fact that he has not been dismissed, and is instead being treated as a martyr by the television company he works for, says a great deal about its standards of journalism.
It goes on to say that "to its shame," Al Baghdadia, Al-Zaidi's employer, is defending him, and "to their shame," organizations like Reporters Without Borders did not "condemn the attempted assault".
While this is not surprising, I find it no less wrong-headed and maddening. As we see all too often in our society, order and decorum are what matter most. When millions of people take to the streets to protest an immoral war, what matters is whether or not the protesters were peaceful and how many people were arrested. The violence, destruction and injustice being perpetrated by the state are secondary. How did the crowd express its anger? Was order kept? Did they behave politely?
I can't blame this on the mainstream media, as in this case it reflects what too many people believe and have been conditioned to react. In comments on my original post about the shoe-throwing, I learned that "two wrongs don't make a right" has become a standard response to the incident.
This is the same moral illogic that says war is wrong, but war resisters should be punished because they signed a contract. It's the same moral illogic that condemned human rights protesters when they dared to disrupt the Olympic torch relay.
A commonly heard sentiment goes something like, "Now that the protests have turned violent and protesters are committing vandalism, I question my support for Tibet!" . . .
The authoritarian streak in so many ordinary people amazes me. Some people are so besotted with order that their moral code runs for cover when the voice of the people gets too loud. If you are in such a huff because a protest turned rowdy or (heaven forbid!) somebody's property was damaged that you would actually stop sympathizing with people struggling against an occupation, I have to question your core values.
What is this "order" so many people hold so dear? Sometimes it's fear. Capitulation. Submission. Sometimes it's allowing the state to be more important than the people who it purports to represent.
Here are some replies to the G&M editorial that ran today.
Your editorial points to the harm done to a free press by Muntadar al-Zaidi's flying shoes. Of course, a lot of people around the world have been wondering for a long time where the "free" press was, particularly in the United States, in the run-up to the war in Iraq.
The real disgrace to democracy and freedom is when the press does not play its role in questioning leaders, parrots the official neo-con line and plays down anti-war protests across the globe.
Shahid Salam, Toronto
*
Just because your country is invaded and destroyed and hundreds of thousands of your people die in the ensuing mayhem, just because your countrymen are tortured, just because your national infrastructure remains in ruins, all without provocation, is no reason to be rude and throw shoes.
Better for journalists to behave as they did at the outset of this war - as enablers and toadies.
J.C. Henry, Mississauga
*
They say "the pen is mightier than the sword." Well, it looks like a flying shoe wins hands-down. Muntadar al-Zaidi, the Iraqi who threw his shoes at George W. Bush, expressed the helpless outrage of many around the world. It was only in 2006 that Mr. Bush signed the Military Commissions Act, giving immunity to U.S. government officials. What are a couple of flying shoes?
Helen Sadowski, Edmonton
*
The Globe thinks the shoe-throwing journalist's behaviour unprofessional and calls for his firing. Etiquette trumps honest rage at the deaths of uncounted thousands.
Rick Taves, Wheatley, ON
Labels:
civil liberties,
human rights,
media,
war and peace
what i'm watching: when the levees broke
If the storm doesn't kill me the government will
I've got to get that out of my head
It's a new day today and the coffee is strong
I've finally got some rest
So a man's put to task and challenges
I was taught to hold my head high
Collect what is mine,
Make the best of what today has
Houston is filled with promise
Laredo is a beautiful place
Galveston sings like that song that I loved
Its meaning has not been erased
And so there are claims forgiven
And so there are things that are gone
Houston is filled with promise
Laredo is a beautiful place
Galveston sings like that song that I loved
Its meaning has not been erased
And some things, they fall to the wayside
Their memory is yet to be still
Belief has not failed me
And so I am put to the test
"Houston," Michael Stipe, Peter Buck, Mike Mills
I've got to get that out of my head
It's a new day today and the coffee is strong
I've finally got some rest
So a man's put to task and challenges
I was taught to hold my head high
Collect what is mine,
Make the best of what today has
Houston is filled with promise
Laredo is a beautiful place
Galveston sings like that song that I loved
Its meaning has not been erased
And so there are claims forgiven
And so there are things that are gone
Houston is filled with promise
Laredo is a beautiful place
Galveston sings like that song that I loved
Its meaning has not been erased
And some things, they fall to the wayside
Their memory is yet to be still
Belief has not failed me
And so I am put to the test
"Houston," Michael Stipe, Peter Buck, Mike Mills
We just finished watching "When The Levees Broke," Spike Lee's documentary about the destruction of New Orleans and its people after the failure of the levees during Hurricane Katrina.
I don't know why it took me so long to see this movie. Perhaps it's because August 29, 2005 was our last day in New York City, and August 30, 2005 was the day we moved to Canada. When we plugged back into the world and came up for air, we struggled to grasp what had happened.
Or perhaps it's because I knew how much it would hurt. Four hours of unremitting pain, and the incredible resiliency of the human spirit.
It's a great movie, very well made, by far Lee's best and most important film. I always think I'm the last person to see any movie, but if there's anyone else out there who hasn't seen it yet, do.
A hurricane: Bush, FEMA, insurance companies, racism, neglect and the Army Corps of Engineers. If you want to know why I came to hate the country of my birth, watch this movie. But keep a box of tissues handy.
Labels:
bigotry,
music,
poverty and class,
us regression,
what i'm watching
12.16.2008
belt tightening at chez L-sock
Money is tight in our home right now, and we've got plenty of company there, I know. Since the first Toronto law firm I worked for dissolved, I've never got my income back to where it was. I'm grateful we're both employed in seemingly secure jobs (although security may be an illusion), and considering how many people are suffering all around us, I can't complain - and I don't. But we do need to stay within a budget, and there's not a lot of wiggle room.
Lately I've been poring over our bills to see what I might be able to cut out. One non-essential is the level of cable TV we get. The main reason we have cable - 99% of why we need it - is to watch out-of-town baseball games from April to the end of October. So for the months in between, while we're subscribing to Zip, why also pay for this level of digital cable?
Except for baseball, we watch almost no TV. Movies are on DVD; no cable needed for that. And CBC is on basic cable anyway. The only thing I use Rogers' "VIP" digital cable for is to find the comedies I like to watch before bed. But how much do I want to pay to watch The Simpsons from Halifax or Corner Gas from Calgary?
Today I collected all the information from the friendly, helpful Rogers representative (and they are always friendly and helpful, no sarcasm there), and Allan and I discussed our options.
I thought there might be some termination or activation fee, which might make downgrading not worthwhile, but there is none. With the "VIP package" that we've been getting, we get an extra outlet at no charge (cable hookups on two TVs for the price of one), and the digital box is included, and some other stuff. With basic cable, we'd have to pay extra for each of those.
So after crunching the numbers, here's what we're doing. No cable at all on one TV. That TV will only be used for movies. We never watch TV on that one anyway. On the other TV, we'll get basic cable only, but we'll keep the digital box for better reception. And I'm going to learn a new sleep habit: comedy on DVD.
This would only apply through the end of March, but the savings will still be significant.
Then, in baseball season, we normally buy: the "VIP" cable package, plus the sports package that gives us our Red Sox games, plus MLB-TV online, so Allan can watch games at work, which often accounts for half the games in any given week. It really adds up.
Now Allan is investigating whether we can run MLB-TV from his laptop through the TV. If we can do that, we won't have to upgrade back to the "VIP" cable package, and we won't need the sports package. We'll only buy MLB-TV for use at home and work. Over the course of the year, this will save a big bundle of money, and the loss seems almost insignificant.
I feel lighter already.
Lately I've been poring over our bills to see what I might be able to cut out. One non-essential is the level of cable TV we get. The main reason we have cable - 99% of why we need it - is to watch out-of-town baseball games from April to the end of October. So for the months in between, while we're subscribing to Zip, why also pay for this level of digital cable?
Except for baseball, we watch almost no TV. Movies are on DVD; no cable needed for that. And CBC is on basic cable anyway. The only thing I use Rogers' "VIP" digital cable for is to find the comedies I like to watch before bed. But how much do I want to pay to watch The Simpsons from Halifax or Corner Gas from Calgary?
Today I collected all the information from the friendly, helpful Rogers representative (and they are always friendly and helpful, no sarcasm there), and Allan and I discussed our options.
I thought there might be some termination or activation fee, which might make downgrading not worthwhile, but there is none. With the "VIP package" that we've been getting, we get an extra outlet at no charge (cable hookups on two TVs for the price of one), and the digital box is included, and some other stuff. With basic cable, we'd have to pay extra for each of those.
So after crunching the numbers, here's what we're doing. No cable at all on one TV. That TV will only be used for movies. We never watch TV on that one anyway. On the other TV, we'll get basic cable only, but we'll keep the digital box for better reception. And I'm going to learn a new sleep habit: comedy on DVD.
This would only apply through the end of March, but the savings will still be significant.
Then, in baseball season, we normally buy: the "VIP" cable package, plus the sports package that gives us our Red Sox games, plus MLB-TV online, so Allan can watch games at work, which often accounts for half the games in any given week. It really adds up.
Now Allan is investigating whether we can run MLB-TV from his laptop through the TV. If we can do that, we won't have to upgrade back to the "VIP" cable package, and we won't need the sports package. We'll only buy MLB-TV for use at home and work. Over the course of the year, this will save a big bundle of money, and the loss seems almost insignificant.
I feel lighter already.
Labels:
baseball,
miscellaneous blather,
personal
play the "launch a shoe at bush" game
Many thanks to Mike Woloshin of Veterans for Peace for sending this!
Launch A Shoe At Bush Video Game: click here and follow the directions!
Says Andy Berman of Veterans For Peace Chapter 27, Minneapolis-St. Paul: "Up here in Minnesota, we all speak a little Norwegian. But if you don't you can still play, just read carefully:"
1. Set the angle of your launch by moving the black bar on VINKLE (angle)
2. Set the force of your launch by moving the black bar on STRYKE (force)
3. Launch the shoe by clicking KAST SKOEN
FREE Montaher Al-Zaidi!
Video, links and discussion in this thread.
Launch A Shoe At Bush Video Game: click here and follow the directions!
Says Andy Berman of Veterans For Peace Chapter 27, Minneapolis-St. Paul: "Up here in Minnesota, we all speak a little Norwegian. But if you don't you can still play, just read carefully:"
1. Set the angle of your launch by moving the black bar on VINKLE (angle)
2. Set the force of your launch by moving the black bar on STRYKE (force)
3. Launch the shoe by clicking KAST SKOEN
FREE Montaher Al-Zaidi!
Video, links and discussion in this thread.
it's a coup!
A coup! A power grab! They're in bed with filthy separatists. They're overturning an elected... blah blah blah.
See here.
But they clearly didn't read my acceptance speech, in which I stated:
Should I ask Saskboy to prorogue?
More importantly, how offended should I be that wmtc has been compared to the Harper Government?!
See here.
But they clearly didn't read my acceptance speech, in which I stated:
It was a very tight contest, without a strong turnout, so I welcome a coalition with proportional representation.
Should I ask Saskboy to prorogue?
More importantly, how offended should I be that wmtc has been compared to the Harper Government?!
thinking about water
Tony Clarke is the director of the Polaris Institute, the author of Inside The Bottle, an Exposé of the Bottled Water Industry, and a leader in the fight against the bottled-water industry - which means the fight for safe, publicly-available water worldwide. This week, he wrote this in the Toronto Star.
This got me thinking.
Although I'm aware of the global fight against water privatization, and I see it as a profoundly important - and enraging - issue, I only know the vague outlines. I'm familiar with the water protests that have rocked many countries, especially the protests in Cochabamba, Bolivia.
I know that Canada has a full 20% of the world's total freshwater resources, and I know about the fight to protect Canada's water, spearheaded by groups like the Council of Canadians. (In case you missed it, Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians, recently was appointed to the United Nations as Senior Advisor on Water Issues.)
So, as I said, I'm aware of this, but like many important issues, it hovers in the margins of my attention. I haven't read about it depth or in detail.
In 2006, we were in Peru, where tap water is not drinkable. Peruvians with money have water purifiers in their home; the majority boils water before using it. Tourists buy bottled water. Buy and buy and buy.
If you're camping, you can boil water, but for most visitors, there's no choice. The tourist season - the non-rainy season - is warm, you need to drink, and you can't drink water from the tap. Everywhere you turn, women are selling bottled water. Every time you board a bus, or a train, or take a taxi, or walk to a site, or step into a plaza, there are women or children selling bottles of water.
Tourism is Peru's third-largest industry. According to Wikipedia, tourism is the most rapidly growing industry in Peru, growing 25% annually over the past five years, and growing faster in Peru than in any other South American country. A lot of people are drinking a lot of bottled water.
And - except for one snack bar in Machu Picchu which sells water in glass bottles - all the bottles are plastic. And plastic is not recycled.
Glass is recycled. In a country with so much poverty, there's no need for mandatory recycling. No one throws out anything that can be re-used. People scavenge for broken or discarded glass, and bring it to used-glass shops for spare change. But plastic is tossed in the trash.
The whole time we were in Peru, and long after we returned, I kept thinking, where is all this plastic going?
And I often wondered, why can't - why won't - a country provide safe drinking water to all its people? We were there just before an important election, and I saw banners reading "Agua Potable Para Todos" - Drinkable Water For All - but I assumed it was an empty slogan.
I wondered, does the bottled-water industry have a hand in this?
I confess that's as far as I got. Now I'd like to learn more. Clarke's Inside The Bottle seems like a good place to start, as does the book Bottlemania - How Water Went on Sale and We Bought It, by Elizabeth Royte.
* * * *
Tangentially on the subject of Peru, just a few weeks ago, there were protests in Lima against Peruvian president Alan Garcia and the Resident, who was in the country for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit. Earlier this year, when Canada signed a free-trade agreement with Peru, a progressive Canadian blogger asked sarcastically, What does Canada want, reduced admission to Macchu Pichu?
I was a bit horrified that anyone would so ignorantly dismiss another country's economic issues. A scant knowledge of world resources should provide an answer. Canada: mining industry. South America: mines.
Toronto's decision last week to ban the sale and distribution of bottled water on city premises was a watershed moment for water justice advocates the world over. What was truly significant about Toronto's action was not that it banned an environmentally destructive product, but that it included a commitment to ensuring access to tap water in all city facilities.
Toronto is now the largest city in the world to pass such far-reaching regulations controlling the distribution of bottled water on municipal property and promoting the use of publicly delivered tap water. Other Canadian and American municipalities have enacted policies encouraging the consumption of tap water and limiting the distribution of bottled water using taxpayer money, but none as large as Toronto has taken such a comprehensive approach.
Toronto's action is in many ways the result of a diverse North American public campaign that has successfully raised awareness about bottled water as an unnecessary and wasteful product when the majority of people in Canada and the United States have access to clean drinking water from the tap.
. . . .
In the days leading up to the Toronto vote, city councillors faced a barrage of lobbying from the bottled water industry. These frantic attempts to defeat the resolution continued over the two days of debates when the industry brought a battery of lobbyists, corporate executives and industry associations into the council chamber to influence the vote. Representatives from the Canadian Bottled Water Association, Refreshments Canada and Nestlé Waters, along with their hired lobbyists from the Sussex Strategy Group and Argyle Communications, intensively lobbied councillors during the entire six-hour debate. However, their high-priced strategy ultimately failed to influence elected officials, who voted with a two-thirds majority to ban bottled water and reinvest in the public delivery of drinking water.
For many, Toronto has now become the champion of the "Back to the Tap" municipal movement in Canada. To date, this movement has already seen 17 municipalities from five provinces ban the bottle. With 45 others indicating an interest to follow suit, Toronto's leadership will no doubt inspire more municipalities to stand up and speak out in support of public water. . . . [Full essay here.]
This got me thinking.
Although I'm aware of the global fight against water privatization, and I see it as a profoundly important - and enraging - issue, I only know the vague outlines. I'm familiar with the water protests that have rocked many countries, especially the protests in Cochabamba, Bolivia.
I know that Canada has a full 20% of the world's total freshwater resources, and I know about the fight to protect Canada's water, spearheaded by groups like the Council of Canadians. (In case you missed it, Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians, recently was appointed to the United Nations as Senior Advisor on Water Issues.)
So, as I said, I'm aware of this, but like many important issues, it hovers in the margins of my attention. I haven't read about it depth or in detail.
In 2006, we were in Peru, where tap water is not drinkable. Peruvians with money have water purifiers in their home; the majority boils water before using it. Tourists buy bottled water. Buy and buy and buy.
If you're camping, you can boil water, but for most visitors, there's no choice. The tourist season - the non-rainy season - is warm, you need to drink, and you can't drink water from the tap. Everywhere you turn, women are selling bottled water. Every time you board a bus, or a train, or take a taxi, or walk to a site, or step into a plaza, there are women or children selling bottles of water.
Tourism is Peru's third-largest industry. According to Wikipedia, tourism is the most rapidly growing industry in Peru, growing 25% annually over the past five years, and growing faster in Peru than in any other South American country. A lot of people are drinking a lot of bottled water.
And - except for one snack bar in Machu Picchu which sells water in glass bottles - all the bottles are plastic. And plastic is not recycled.
Glass is recycled. In a country with so much poverty, there's no need for mandatory recycling. No one throws out anything that can be re-used. People scavenge for broken or discarded glass, and bring it to used-glass shops for spare change. But plastic is tossed in the trash.
The whole time we were in Peru, and long after we returned, I kept thinking, where is all this plastic going?
And I often wondered, why can't - why won't - a country provide safe drinking water to all its people? We were there just before an important election, and I saw banners reading "Agua Potable Para Todos" - Drinkable Water For All - but I assumed it was an empty slogan.
I wondered, does the bottled-water industry have a hand in this?
I confess that's as far as I got. Now I'd like to learn more. Clarke's Inside The Bottle seems like a good place to start, as does the book Bottlemania - How Water Went on Sale and We Bought It, by Elizabeth Royte.
* * * *
Tangentially on the subject of Peru, just a few weeks ago, there were protests in Lima against Peruvian president Alan Garcia and the Resident, who was in the country for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit. Earlier this year, when Canada signed a free-trade agreement with Peru, a progressive Canadian blogger asked sarcastically, What does Canada want, reduced admission to Macchu Pichu?
I was a bit horrified that anyone would so ignorantly dismiss another country's economic issues. A scant knowledge of world resources should provide an answer. Canada: mining industry. South America: mines.
12.15.2008
slap upside the head = best glbt blog
Congratulations to Slap Upside The Head, one of my favourite blogs, on winning Best GLBT Blog in the Canadian Blog Awards. I love this guy!
gary mason: imagine if joe canadian had been tasered in the bangkok airport
Globe and Mail columnist Gary Mason:
That the Crown wouldn't charge the RCMP officers involved in last year's airport death of Robert Dziekanski was inevitable.
That the Mounties would stoop so low in attempting to explain how and why Mr. Dziekanski met his demise, well, I don't think anyone quite imagined that.
He didn't die because he was tasered five times by three RCMP officers in October of 2007 in an arrivals area at Vancouver International Airport.
He died, we've been told, because he drank too much and had a fear of flying. And when you mix those two things with 50,000 volts of electricity, terrible things happen.
Take away the booze and the anxiety, and Mr. Dziekanski might still be alive.
Right.
And the Crown and the RCMP in British Columbia wonder why Canadians are so outraged by Friday's decision. Every day, more and more feel it isn't right for police to investigate themselves, as was the case here.
Just imagine if Joe Canadian were tasered in, oh, I don't know, let's say the Bangkok airport.
And Joe Canadian died.
Imagine that the Thai police took nine months to complete their investigation, an investigation that included a trip to Canada to look into Joe's past.
And in the end, they decided not to prosecute the police officers involved.
Their report says Joe died because he drank too much and suffered from a flying phobia, which combined to weaken his system and made him vulnerable when he was blasted with 50,000 volts of electricity.
Imagine how Canadians would react to a report like that.
People would be screaming cover-up.
They'd be demanding Prime Minister Stephen Harper level economic sanctions against Thailand. Canadians would be cancelling trips there.
Well, those were pretty much the circumstances here.
Look, whether Mr. Dziekanski drank a lot or not is irrelevant.
He died after he was tasered by police. If he hadn't been tasered, he wouldn't have died. The only question is: Did the tasering constitute an excessive use of force?
Because the guidelines around the use of a taser were so fuzzy at the time of the incident and so open to interpretation as to what constitutes a threat to a police officer, it was always going to be next to impossible to put together a case against the RCMP officers involved.
Whether most Canadians felt four burly Mounties should have been able to take down one Polish immigrant with a stapler in his hand without having to pump taser hooks into him is irrelevant.
On the use-of-force spectrum that Mounties are guided by, or were at the time, Mr. Dziekanski fit the profile of someone who was a candidate to be tasered. He was agitated. He had been destroying equipment at the airport. He had what could be termed to be a weapon.
Mounties have tasered people for less.
Now, you could argue - others have and more will still - that there need to be stricter guidelines covering the weapon's use.
But at the time, the RCMP officers at Vancouver International weren't doing anything their colleagues hadn't done hundreds of times under similar circumstances.
The RCMP didn't need to go dredging up dirt on Mr. Dziekanski's past to justify its actions.
How horrible and petty-minded that makes our police look. How desperate, too. And the RCMP wonder why their reputation becomes more tattered and stained with each passing day.
The death of Mr. Dziekanski will always be a black mark on the Mounties' reputation in B.C.
But the lengths to which the force went to try to escape blame in the tragedy should be enough to convince everyone that the RCMP should no longer be investigating itself.
The Dziekanski case should be the last deplorable example of why a change needs to take place now.
12.14.2008
i hate christmas, part two
Further to my earlier post, I came into work this weekend to find the office (where I work on weekends) has been decorated to the nines. Someone had the idea of using cubicle decorations as a way of raising money for a needy family, and who can complain about that. Surely not me.
I don't like the wreaths, I don't like the ribbons, I don't like the snowflakes. Despite the wintery themes, this is still about Christmas. But I can't say anything - especially working part-time.
But when my own cubicle - which I see a mere two days each week, and which I share with two or three other employees - is adorned with pictures of Baby Jesus, Mother Mary, angels and wise men, I have to speak up.
I noticed there is a Hanukah motif in one cubicle, so I tried to pre-empt that weak argument.
My email, below.
Let's see what happens.
I don't like the wreaths, I don't like the ribbons, I don't like the snowflakes. Despite the wintery themes, this is still about Christmas. But I can't say anything - especially working part-time.
But when my own cubicle - which I see a mere two days each week, and which I share with two or three other employees - is adorned with pictures of Baby Jesus, Mother Mary, angels and wise men, I have to speak up.
I noticed there is a Hanukah motif in one cubicle, so I tried to pre-empt that weak argument.
My email, below.
[HR people]:
I'm sorry to bother you with this, but I feel compelled to speak up.
At this time of year when most people are celebrating Christmas, it's worth remembering that not everyone does. Holiday decorations are always pleasant, but I think pictures depicting religious scenes are not appropriate for the workplace.
I don't think Christian employees would feel comfortable if Muslim or Jewish employees hung religious pictures or symbols. Likewise, those of us who are not Christian may feel uncomfortable seeing religious pictures in our secular workplace. I do. Hanging Chanukah decorations does not make things "even". I don't think any religious depictions are appropriate.
I wonder if you could ask employees to limit Christmas decorations to the non-religious variety. Naturally I would appreciate it if this note is kept confidential.
Thank you very much for your understanding.
Let's see what happens.
Labels:
atheism,
complaints,
i hate christmas,
labour,
personal
bush gets the boot in iraq, but the u.s. isn't going anywhere
Muntazer al-Zaidi, a reporter for the independent al-Baghdadiya television station, threw both of his shoes at Bush on Sunday, shouting in Arabic:
"This is a gift from the Iraqis; this is the farewell kiss, you dog. ... This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq."

In November 2007, al-Zaidi was kidnapped, tortured, and released. He never learned the identity of his captors.
Zaidi covered the US bombing of Baghdad's Sadr City area earlier this year and friends said he had been "emotionally influenced" by the destruction.
While this gives us all a laugh and a cheer, it is, sadly, far from a farewell kiss.
CBC:
Thanks to Redsock for the research.
"This is a gift from the Iraqis; this is the farewell kiss, you dog. ... This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq."

In November 2007, al-Zaidi was kidnapped, tortured, and released. He never learned the identity of his captors.
Zaidi covered the US bombing of Baghdad's Sadr City area earlier this year and friends said he had been "emotionally influenced" by the destruction.
While this gives us all a laugh and a cheer, it is, sadly, far from a farewell kiss.
CBC:
Despite a summer deadline to pull American combat troops from Iraqi cities, thousands will remain to support and train Iraqi forces, the top U.S. commander in Iraq confirmed on Saturday. . . .
[Iraqi government spokesman] Ali al-Dabbagh, on a visit to Washington, said Iraqi security forces might need 10 years to get ready to take over from U.S. troops.
Thanks to Redsock for the research.
write a letter of support to omar khadr
Amnesty International has an an ongoing project called Write For Rights.
There's a list of actions that you can write a letter to support. They gave you background on the case, and recommendations on the content and format of the letter. Some cases have more than one suggested letter-writing action, such as sending a message of support directly to the person who's the subject of the action. There are actions in English, French, Spanish and Arabic, and they involve people struggling for basic freedoms all over the world.
On December 10, 2008, the 60th anniversary of the passage of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, human-rights supporters - people like you and me - held "Writeathons" at their homes, organizations and places of worship. They gathered to celebrate human rights and write letters to governments in support of specific people's cases.
To date, more than 22,500 letters were sent from all over the world. There is ample evidence that letter writing works. And you know what? We don't have to judge our actions' effectiveness before we take action. It costs us so very little. It's worth it just to try.
I love the Writeathon idea. It breaks down something that often feels overwhelming and insurmountable - global human rights abuses - into a series of small, personal, do-able actions. Obviously, I missed the December 10 event, but we can all still write a letter, or more than one letter. An FAQ on the Writeathon is here.
Here's a suggestion for a letter, which I've lifted from the Facebook group Send 1000 Letters of Support To Omar Khadr.
I'm going to write a letter of support to Omar Khadr. I hope you will, too.
* * * *
"Nobody cares about me."
"I want to go back to Canada."
- Omar Khadr during his 2003 interrogation at Guantánamo
•════════════════════•
Tell Omar Khadr that we DO care and that he hasn't been forgotten (even in the midst of the "political crisis").
• Sign a card with a friendly greeting.
• Write a short message of solidarity.
• Create a colourful drawing.
•════════════════════•
~≈• INSTRUCTIONS •≈~
Omar Khadr was 15 years old (a child under international law) and a Canadian citizen when U.S. forces in Afghanistan took him into custody in 2002.
He was transferred to the U.S. Guantánamo prison several months later as a "war on terror" detainee. Seriously wounded when first detained, his interrogation began immediately and continued for three years without access to a lawyer.
He has been reportedly tortured and now faces a grossly unfair trial before a military commission. Other governments have protected and brought home their citizens held at Guantánamo. Not Canada.
• PLEASE SEND A NON-RELIGIOUS CARD TO:
Letters of Hope for Omar Khadr
c/o Amnesty International Canada
312 Laurier Avenue East
Ottawa ON K1R 6Y7
Canada
• SUGGESTED MESSAGE:
"We are thinking of you and sending all good wishes from the Canada."
• NOTE:
Omar is now held in the communal conditions of Camp 4 where it is easier to receive books and other things from his lawyers and Canadian officials. It would be especially meaningful if you could personalise your message by perhaps referring to Omar's interests especially if there are things that you share in common with Omar. For example, Omar is a keen reader so you could write "I hear you've read Harry Potter, I'm a big fan, too", or "I read To Kill a Mockingbird in school".
Omar's reading list includes The Life of Pi, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Swiss Family Robinson, Tin-Tin Comics, The Chronicles of Narnia, Harry Potter: The Deathly Hollows ("the best book he had ever read"), The Da Vinci Code, Canadian Geographic, National Geographic, various car magazines, Grade 7/8 math, science, and English textbooks, and books on origami and yoga.
His other pastimes include soccer, volleyball, basketball (a favourite), and ping pong; observing the birds and iguanas that come into the camp; chess, dominoes, writing letters. A more complete list of Omar's interests can be found on the Amnesty website: here.
• LANGUAGE: English or your own language
• SALUTATION: Dear Omar,
• IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
For the safety of the recipient, please do not include political comments in your message. Also avoid referring to religion, for example, write 'you are in our thoughts' rather than 'you are in our prayers'. You may use Amnesty International cards for this action, and mention Amnesty International. You may put your name and address on the card.
As a part of its annual write-a-thon Amnesty International will bundle together all the messages of hope and support and expedite them directly to Guantanamo, and into Omar's hands.
HAVE YOUR LETTER DO DOUBLE DUTY:
• Register your letter with Amnesty International here.
• Wanna know more about this whole write-a-thon thing? About the writeathon.
• Ever considered joining Amnesty International? Become a member.
There's a list of actions that you can write a letter to support. They gave you background on the case, and recommendations on the content and format of the letter. Some cases have more than one suggested letter-writing action, such as sending a message of support directly to the person who's the subject of the action. There are actions in English, French, Spanish and Arabic, and they involve people struggling for basic freedoms all over the world.
On December 10, 2008, the 60th anniversary of the passage of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, human-rights supporters - people like you and me - held "Writeathons" at their homes, organizations and places of worship. They gathered to celebrate human rights and write letters to governments in support of specific people's cases.
To date, more than 22,500 letters were sent from all over the world. There is ample evidence that letter writing works. And you know what? We don't have to judge our actions' effectiveness before we take action. It costs us so very little. It's worth it just to try.
I love the Writeathon idea. It breaks down something that often feels overwhelming and insurmountable - global human rights abuses - into a series of small, personal, do-able actions. Obviously, I missed the December 10 event, but we can all still write a letter, or more than one letter. An FAQ on the Writeathon is here.
Here's a suggestion for a letter, which I've lifted from the Facebook group Send 1000 Letters of Support To Omar Khadr.
I'm going to write a letter of support to Omar Khadr. I hope you will, too.
* * * *
"Nobody cares about me."
"I want to go back to Canada."
- Omar Khadr during his 2003 interrogation at Guantánamo
•════════════════════•
Tell Omar Khadr that we DO care and that he hasn't been forgotten (even in the midst of the "political crisis").
• Sign a card with a friendly greeting.
• Write a short message of solidarity.
• Create a colourful drawing.
•════════════════════•
~≈• INSTRUCTIONS •≈~
Omar Khadr was 15 years old (a child under international law) and a Canadian citizen when U.S. forces in Afghanistan took him into custody in 2002.
He was transferred to the U.S. Guantánamo prison several months later as a "war on terror" detainee. Seriously wounded when first detained, his interrogation began immediately and continued for three years without access to a lawyer.
He has been reportedly tortured and now faces a grossly unfair trial before a military commission. Other governments have protected and brought home their citizens held at Guantánamo. Not Canada.
• PLEASE SEND A NON-RELIGIOUS CARD TO:
Letters of Hope for Omar Khadr
c/o Amnesty International Canada
312 Laurier Avenue East
Ottawa ON K1R 6Y7
Canada
• SUGGESTED MESSAGE:
"We are thinking of you and sending all good wishes from the Canada."
• NOTE:
Omar is now held in the communal conditions of Camp 4 where it is easier to receive books and other things from his lawyers and Canadian officials. It would be especially meaningful if you could personalise your message by perhaps referring to Omar's interests especially if there are things that you share in common with Omar. For example, Omar is a keen reader so you could write "I hear you've read Harry Potter, I'm a big fan, too", or "I read To Kill a Mockingbird in school".
Omar's reading list includes The Life of Pi, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Swiss Family Robinson, Tin-Tin Comics, The Chronicles of Narnia, Harry Potter: The Deathly Hollows ("the best book he had ever read"), The Da Vinci Code, Canadian Geographic, National Geographic, various car magazines, Grade 7/8 math, science, and English textbooks, and books on origami and yoga.
His other pastimes include soccer, volleyball, basketball (a favourite), and ping pong; observing the birds and iguanas that come into the camp; chess, dominoes, writing letters. A more complete list of Omar's interests can be found on the Amnesty website: here.
• LANGUAGE: English or your own language
• SALUTATION: Dear Omar,
• IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
For the safety of the recipient, please do not include political comments in your message. Also avoid referring to religion, for example, write 'you are in our thoughts' rather than 'you are in our prayers'. You may use Amnesty International cards for this action, and mention Amnesty International. You may put your name and address on the card.
As a part of its annual write-a-thon Amnesty International will bundle together all the messages of hope and support and expedite them directly to Guantanamo, and into Omar's hands.
HAVE YOUR LETTER DO DOUBLE DUTY:
• Register your letter with Amnesty International here.
• Wanna know more about this whole write-a-thon thing? About the writeathon.
• Ever considered joining Amnesty International? Become a member.
Labels:
canadian politics,
human rights,
war and peace
wmtc wins best progressive blog in canadian blog awards
Thank you!
It was a very tight contest, without a strong turnout, so I welcome a coalition with proportional representation.
Congratulations to the second- and third-place finishers, Danielle Takacs and Dawg's Blog, and to runners-up The Galloping Beaver and Daveberta. I'm honoured to be in their company.
No coalition for Redsock, he'll be running a majority government, as Joy of Sox handily won Best Sports Blog.
* * * *
Late update: My apologies to Calgary Grit! Dan Arnold's excellent blog placed fourth, and I completely forgot to include it. Sorry, Dan!
12.13.2008
universal declaration of human rights
Happy 60th Birthday, Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Let's hope we do better in your next 60 years.
Thanks to Antonia Zerbiasias. I also meant to blog about this, but forgot, so please go read it now.
u.s. war resister claims asylum in germany
On November 26, 2008, former US Army Specialist André Shepherd became the first Iraq War veteran to apply for refugee status in Germany.
Shepherd, who enlisted in the military in 2004, served six months on a forward operating base near Tikrit. About the Iraqis, Shepherd says, "Some had the look of fear, while others looked outright angry and resentful. . . . I began to feel like a cruel oppressor who had destroyed the lives of these proud people.
"Our unit did a lot of good things, giving schools books and bringing clothes to children. These actions helped my conscience a bit, but I kept thinking to myself, 'Had we not invaded, would these people need this aid now?'"
Shepherd began researching the causes of the Iraq War, and the wider so-called War on Terror. Eventually, perhaps inevitably, he lost faith in the mission. He says: "Saddam Hussein was admittedly a dictator. However, he was not leading his country to produce any sort of weapon that could be used against the United States government and its citizens.
"When I asked my sergeant about this, he told me that many in the Army also had questions, but it was their duty to serve. That may be true, but signing up voluntarily does not mean I should stop thinking or having a conscience."
When the deployment ended, Shepherd's unit returned to Germany, and he began to investigate the options available to an US soldier who questions the morality of war. As we know, in practical terms, there are none.
After months of deliberations, on April 11, 2007, Shepherd packed his things went AWOL. It is believed he is the first US soldier to apply for asylum in any European nation.
You can read more about Shepherd's story and hear a 30-minute interview with him here.
Connection e.V. is the German peace group supporting Shepherd. They are appealing to all people of peace and conscience to help support their struggle. Here's the English-language version of a letter from them.
Through Connection e.V., you can sign an appeal to the German government, send a solidarity postcard to Shepherd and donate to his legal defense fund.
Many thanks to Courage To Resist, Military Counseling Network and Connection e.V. for their work on behalf of André Shepherd, and on behalf of all the soldiers who are choosing not to fight.
Shepherd, who enlisted in the military in 2004, served six months on a forward operating base near Tikrit. About the Iraqis, Shepherd says, "Some had the look of fear, while others looked outright angry and resentful. . . . I began to feel like a cruel oppressor who had destroyed the lives of these proud people.
"Our unit did a lot of good things, giving schools books and bringing clothes to children. These actions helped my conscience a bit, but I kept thinking to myself, 'Had we not invaded, would these people need this aid now?'"
Shepherd began researching the causes of the Iraq War, and the wider so-called War on Terror. Eventually, perhaps inevitably, he lost faith in the mission. He says: "Saddam Hussein was admittedly a dictator. However, he was not leading his country to produce any sort of weapon that could be used against the United States government and its citizens.
"When I asked my sergeant about this, he told me that many in the Army also had questions, but it was their duty to serve. That may be true, but signing up voluntarily does not mean I should stop thinking or having a conscience."
When the deployment ended, Shepherd's unit returned to Germany, and he began to investigate the options available to an US soldier who questions the morality of war. As we know, in practical terms, there are none.
After months of deliberations, on April 11, 2007, Shepherd packed his things went AWOL. It is believed he is the first US soldier to apply for asylum in any European nation.
You can read more about Shepherd's story and hear a 30-minute interview with him here.
Connection e.V. is the German peace group supporting Shepherd. They are appealing to all people of peace and conscience to help support their struggle. Here's the English-language version of a letter from them.
On Nov. 26, 2008, AWOL US soldier André Shepherd applied for asylum in Germany. His tour of duty in Iraq caused him to acknowledge that he could no longer take part in an illegal war which is contrary to the international laws of human rights.
Because he does not fit the American military regulations' definition of a conscientious objector, he decided to go Absent Without Leave and apply for asylum in Germany. In his application he pointed to the directive of the European Union, from October 2006. This directive protects persons who remove themselves from such wars or actions which are against human rights, and then must fear persecution.
In light of the potential outcomes for an AWOL American soldier, his decision is courageous. The United States and Germany have a long friendship with many military and economic ties. Criminal prosecution hangs over him, even after the election of the new U.S. President Barack Obama. In a similar case, U.S. military resister Robin Long was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment after his deportation out of Canada.
Currently, André Shepherd is waiting for the decision of the German Federal Office of Migration regarding his application for asylum. He needs political and financial support.
Through Connection e.V., you can sign an appeal to the German government, send a solidarity postcard to Shepherd and donate to his legal defense fund.
Many thanks to Courage To Resist, Military Counseling Network and Connection e.V. for their work on behalf of André Shepherd, and on behalf of all the soldiers who are choosing not to fight.
Labels:
activism,
war and peace,
war resisters
chickens are not machines
Millions of egg-laying hens all across Canada are confined in barren, wire battery cages so restrictive that the birds can't even spread their wings. These birds suffer through their entire lives, so that people can wring more profit out of them. You can read more about the cruelty of battery cages here.
Animal advocates have persuaded local councils in many towns and cities to improve the lives of these animals. Your municipal council can do the same.
Humane Society International Canada is asking us to contact our city councils and encourage them to pass cage-free resolutions. The first Canadian municipality to do this was Richmond, BC. To date, 14 other city councils have followed, including the Ontario cities of Orillia and Pickering.
I know from my own reading that the "free range" or "cage free" designation does not necessarily mean the chickens lived healthy, outdoor lives. By adhering to the letter of a regulation but not the spirit, farm owners can still cram "free range" chickens into tiny, over-crowded, inhumane conditions. However, getting rid of battery cages is an important first step.
I wrote this letter to the City Manager of Mississauga. I hope you will send a similar letter to your own city council.
Here's what you do:
1. Google the name of your city plus "city council", and look for contact info.
2. Copy the letter below into an email, changing the names where appropriate. I encourage you to swap a few of my sentences with a few of your own, so the letter is more personalized.
3. Send it!
4. Go to HSI Canada and tell them you sent a letter by clicking here, or simply forward your sent letter to info@hsicanada.ca.
Thank you! My letter:
Subject: please pass resolution regarding egg-laying hens
Dear Ms. Baker and Mississauga City Council Members:
I am a resident of Mississauga, and I am writing to you to alert you that there is something simple and reasonable you can do to help stop cruelty to animals - cruelty that we all contribute to.
I urge you to take action on behalf of millions of egg-laying hens who, confined to tiny, crowded battery cages all their lives, do not even have enough space to turn around or spread their wings.
I know that some people read this and ask, "Chickens? Why should I care about chickens?" I am not a vegetarian. I eat chicken and I eat eggs, and I don't suggest anyone should do otherwise. But the animals that we eat are not machines. They are living creatures. They feel pain. In their short lives before they become our food, they deserve to not be tortured.
I respectfully request that Mississauga City Council pass a simple, cost-neutral resolution to improve the lives of egg-laying hens in Canada, similar to the one passed in May 2007 by the City of Richmond, BC, as well as 14 other Canadian cities since that time. The resolution could read as follows:
That the council of the Mississauga resolves:
(1) to encourage Mississauga residents:
(i) as restaurants and caterers in both private and City operations, to highlight the support for and availability of certified organic, free-range eggs on their menus;
(ii) as consumers, to request the option of purchasing certified organic, free-range eggs at retail food outlets and restaurants and, where available, choose the certified organic, free-range option;
(iii) as wholesalers, to highlight the preference for and availability of certified organic, free-range eggs in their food supply inventories; and
(iv) as retailers, to highlight the preference for and availability of certified organic, free-range eggs in their food stores;
(2) That the operators and caterers of City-run facilities be requested to use only certified organic, free-range or free-run whole (shell) eggs; and
(3) That a letter be written to the Provincial Government, Federal Government and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency stating that the Mississauga City Council opposes battery cage egg production based on the inherent cruelty of confining egg-laying hens in battery cages.
(4) That a letter be written to the Ontario Municipalities Association requesting all members adopt a similar initiative.
Thank you very much for hearing my concerns.
Sincerely,
Laura Kaminker
[address]
Animal advocates have persuaded local councils in many towns and cities to improve the lives of these animals. Your municipal council can do the same.
Humane Society International Canada is asking us to contact our city councils and encourage them to pass cage-free resolutions. The first Canadian municipality to do this was Richmond, BC. To date, 14 other city councils have followed, including the Ontario cities of Orillia and Pickering.
I know from my own reading that the "free range" or "cage free" designation does not necessarily mean the chickens lived healthy, outdoor lives. By adhering to the letter of a regulation but not the spirit, farm owners can still cram "free range" chickens into tiny, over-crowded, inhumane conditions. However, getting rid of battery cages is an important first step.
I wrote this letter to the City Manager of Mississauga. I hope you will send a similar letter to your own city council.
Here's what you do:
1. Google the name of your city plus "city council", and look for contact info.
2. Copy the letter below into an email, changing the names where appropriate. I encourage you to swap a few of my sentences with a few of your own, so the letter is more personalized.
3. Send it!
4. Go to HSI Canada and tell them you sent a letter by clicking here, or simply forward your sent letter to info@hsicanada.ca.
Thank you! My letter:
Subject: please pass resolution regarding egg-laying hens
Dear Ms. Baker and Mississauga City Council Members:
I am a resident of Mississauga, and I am writing to you to alert you that there is something simple and reasonable you can do to help stop cruelty to animals - cruelty that we all contribute to.
I urge you to take action on behalf of millions of egg-laying hens who, confined to tiny, crowded battery cages all their lives, do not even have enough space to turn around or spread their wings.
I know that some people read this and ask, "Chickens? Why should I care about chickens?" I am not a vegetarian. I eat chicken and I eat eggs, and I don't suggest anyone should do otherwise. But the animals that we eat are not machines. They are living creatures. They feel pain. In their short lives before they become our food, they deserve to not be tortured.
I respectfully request that Mississauga City Council pass a simple, cost-neutral resolution to improve the lives of egg-laying hens in Canada, similar to the one passed in May 2007 by the City of Richmond, BC, as well as 14 other Canadian cities since that time. The resolution could read as follows:
That the council of the Mississauga resolves:
(1) to encourage Mississauga residents:
(i) as restaurants and caterers in both private and City operations, to highlight the support for and availability of certified organic, free-range eggs on their menus;
(ii) as consumers, to request the option of purchasing certified organic, free-range eggs at retail food outlets and restaurants and, where available, choose the certified organic, free-range option;
(iii) as wholesalers, to highlight the preference for and availability of certified organic, free-range eggs in their food supply inventories; and
(iv) as retailers, to highlight the preference for and availability of certified organic, free-range eggs in their food stores;
(2) That the operators and caterers of City-run facilities be requested to use only certified organic, free-range or free-run whole (shell) eggs; and
(3) That a letter be written to the Provincial Government, Federal Government and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency stating that the Mississauga City Council opposes battery cage egg production based on the inherent cruelty of confining egg-laying hens in battery cages.
(4) That a letter be written to the Ontario Municipalities Association requesting all members adopt a similar initiative.
Thank you very much for hearing my concerns.
Sincerely,
Laura Kaminker
[address]
Labels:
activism,
animals (other than dogs),
environment,
food issues
12.12.2008
getting away with murder
It appears that the men who killed Robert Dziekanski will not face criminal charges. The British Columbia Ministry of the Attorney-General has decided that there is "insufficient evidence to warrant a prosecution".
Insufficient evidence. Even though we've seen the whole thing on video. Rodney King says hi.
Insufficient evidence. Even though we've seen the whole thing on video. Rodney King says hi.
Labels:
canadian culture,
civil liberties,
human rights
congratulations - again - to chantal petitclerc
A few days ago, Canadian Paralympic athlete Chantal Petitclerc was named the recipient of this year's Lou Marsh Award, which is given annually to Canada's most outstanding athlete.
Petitclerc won five gold medals in the Beijing Paralympics, one in every women's wheelchair track event. She now owns a total of 14 gold medals over a span of five Paralympic Games, plus five silver and two bronze. Petitclerc hasn't lost in 10 consecutive Paralympic races dating back to 2004 in Athens.
Petitclerc is also, to my mind, one of the most engaging and interesting people I've ever had the pleasure to interview. She is now retiring from the track, and I'll be watching her post-Paralympic career with great interest.
My story about Petitclerc is here; her website here.
Petitclerc won five gold medals in the Beijing Paralympics, one in every women's wheelchair track event. She now owns a total of 14 gold medals over a span of five Paralympic Games, plus five silver and two bronze. Petitclerc hasn't lost in 10 consecutive Paralympic races dating back to 2004 in Athens.
Petitclerc is also, to my mind, one of the most engaging and interesting people I've ever had the pleasure to interview. She is now retiring from the track, and I'll be watching her post-Paralympic career with great interest.
My story about Petitclerc is here; her website here.
black books, episode one
You may have noticed some chatter in comments about "Black Books," a defunct British comedy starring and co-written by Dylan Moran. Allan and I stumbled on the first season of this many years ago on the US channel Comedy Central, shown late at night and not promoted at all. We fell in love with it, then - typical for us - it disappeared.
Just last year, the complete series (three seasons) finally came out on DVD. Allan bought it about the same time we discovered Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, and so we learned that Dylan Moran is part of this constellation of brilliant British comic actors. Moran has a small role in Simon Pegg's "Shaun of the Dead," and a big supporting role in "Run, Fat Boy, Run". Both Pegg and Frost have cameos in Black Books, and there are other connections.
After going out last night, eating and drinking a bit too much, we watched a few episodes of "Black Books". I was going to transcribe one of my favourite bits here, but it needs Moran's delivery and the store's ambiance to deliver the humour. So here you go.
The line I loved so much was Bernard Black's response to "I thought you were gay". But if you haven't seen this, do yourself a favour and watch the whole thing.
Cooking The Books, part 1
Cooking The Books, part 2
Cooking The Books, part 3
A line from episode three, "The Grapes of Wrath," lives on in our home. Bernard, taste buds dead from smoking so much, bites into a coaster and declares it "some sort of delicious biscuit". When you have dogs, this line comes in handy. "The Grapes of Wrath" may be the funniest episode of the whole series.
Just last year, the complete series (three seasons) finally came out on DVD. Allan bought it about the same time we discovered Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, and so we learned that Dylan Moran is part of this constellation of brilliant British comic actors. Moran has a small role in Simon Pegg's "Shaun of the Dead," and a big supporting role in "Run, Fat Boy, Run". Both Pegg and Frost have cameos in Black Books, and there are other connections.
After going out last night, eating and drinking a bit too much, we watched a few episodes of "Black Books". I was going to transcribe one of my favourite bits here, but it needs Moran's delivery and the store's ambiance to deliver the humour. So here you go.
The line I loved so much was Bernard Black's response to "I thought you were gay". But if you haven't seen this, do yourself a favour and watch the whole thing.
Cooking The Books, part 1
Cooking The Books, part 2
Cooking The Books, part 3
A line from episode three, "The Grapes of Wrath," lives on in our home. Bernard, taste buds dead from smoking so much, bites into a coaster and declares it "some sort of delicious biscuit". When you have dogs, this line comes in handy. "The Grapes of Wrath" may be the funniest episode of the whole series.
12.11.2008
another war resister gets deportation order
The deportation orders are coming so fast, our heads are spinning.
It is maddening! Harper suspends Parliament because he can't get his way, and good people who want nothing but to live in Canada in peace are hung out to dry.
I know there are many, many Canadians suffering right now. People are losing their homes, losing their jobs, losing their pensions. I'm not insensitive to that. But my heart is breaking for the war resisters, whose fates hang in the balance.
The latest victim of the heartless Harper Government is Clifford Cornell.
Cliff, who lives in Nanaimo, BC, received a negative decision on his Pre-Removal Risk Assessment, and has told to leave Canada by December 24. That's barely enough time to give notice to his employer and pack his possessions.
Cliff is originally from Arkansas; he came to Canada in 2005, and lived in Toronto for a while before moving west. He's the assistant manager of a small store in his town.
To summarize the current situation with removal orders:
December 24: Cliff Cornell ordered to leave
January 6: Dean Walcott ordered to leave
January 15: Patrick Hart and his family ordered to leave
February 10: Federal Court to hear appeal by Jeremy Hinzman and family
Early March: Joshua Key to have new refugee hearing
Several other war resisters have pending PRRA decisions, expected at any time.
As we all know, the House of Commons spoke clearly on this issue, adopting a motion on June 3, 2008 that would have cleared up this situation with fairness and in accord with Canada's best traditions. The Harper Government ignored this motion, as well as several independent polls, thousands of letters, phone calls, petitions and emails from Canadians. Clearly they are determined to see the war resisters kicked out of Canada and punished is clear.
We are equally determined to Let Them Stay.
We call on you - our friends and supporters - to do all you can to put pressure on the politicians who can make this stop.
TO: Jason Kenney: minister@cic.gc.ca or kenney.j@parl.gc.ca
CC: Borys Wrzesnewskyj: wrzesnewskyj.b@parl.gc.ca [corrected email address]
CC: Olivia Chow: chow.o@parl.gc.ca
CC: Thierry St-Cyr: st-cyr.t@parl.gc.ca
CC: War Resisters Support Campaign: resisters@sympatico.ca
CC: Your own MP
Please. I know we're all caught up in the wranglings and machinations of the Liberals and the potential coalition. But lives and futures are at stake.
If you support peace - if you support human rights - if you believe in freedom of conscience - if you believe in personal autonomy - if you feel people have a right to refuse to participate in war crimes and human rights abuses - if you oppose the United States' occupation of Iraq - if you want to live in a Canada that supports peace, justice and human rights - then you, by definition, support war resisters.
Please make that support known. Tell them all: Let Them Stay!
It is maddening! Harper suspends Parliament because he can't get his way, and good people who want nothing but to live in Canada in peace are hung out to dry.
I know there are many, many Canadians suffering right now. People are losing their homes, losing their jobs, losing their pensions. I'm not insensitive to that. But my heart is breaking for the war resisters, whose fates hang in the balance.
The latest victim of the heartless Harper Government is Clifford Cornell.
Cliff, who lives in Nanaimo, BC, received a negative decision on his Pre-Removal Risk Assessment, and has told to leave Canada by December 24. That's barely enough time to give notice to his employer and pack his possessions.
Cliff is originally from Arkansas; he came to Canada in 2005, and lived in Toronto for a while before moving west. He's the assistant manager of a small store in his town.
To summarize the current situation with removal orders:
December 24: Cliff Cornell ordered to leave
January 6: Dean Walcott ordered to leave
January 15: Patrick Hart and his family ordered to leave
February 10: Federal Court to hear appeal by Jeremy Hinzman and family
Early March: Joshua Key to have new refugee hearing
Several other war resisters have pending PRRA decisions, expected at any time.
As we all know, the House of Commons spoke clearly on this issue, adopting a motion on June 3, 2008 that would have cleared up this situation with fairness and in accord with Canada's best traditions. The Harper Government ignored this motion, as well as several independent polls, thousands of letters, phone calls, petitions and emails from Canadians. Clearly they are determined to see the war resisters kicked out of Canada and punished is clear.
We are equally determined to Let Them Stay.
We call on you - our friends and supporters - to do all you can to put pressure on the politicians who can make this stop.
TO: Jason Kenney: minister@cic.gc.ca or kenney.j@parl.gc.ca
CC: Borys Wrzesnewskyj: wrzesnewskyj.b@parl.gc.ca [corrected email address]
CC: Olivia Chow: chow.o@parl.gc.ca
CC: Thierry St-Cyr: st-cyr.t@parl.gc.ca
CC: War Resisters Support Campaign: resisters@sympatico.ca
CC: Your own MP
Please. I know we're all caught up in the wranglings and machinations of the Liberals and the potential coalition. But lives and futures are at stake.
If you support peace - if you support human rights - if you believe in freedom of conscience - if you believe in personal autonomy - if you feel people have a right to refuse to participate in war crimes and human rights abuses - if you oppose the United States' occupation of Iraq - if you want to live in a Canada that supports peace, justice and human rights - then you, by definition, support war resisters.
Please make that support known. Tell them all: Let Them Stay!
Labels:
activism,
canadian culture,
canadian politics,
war resisters
u.s. to auction utah canyonlands to oil and gas exploration
On December 19, 300,000 acres of spectacular red-rock canyonlands in Utah will be opened up to oil and gas speculators.
Unless Bushco's fossil-fuels gang is stopped, lands near Canyonlands National Parks, Arches National Parks and Dinosaur National Monument, will be turned over to the highest bidder, then turned into an industrial wasteland. Subsequent auctions will follow, until the leases on 6.4 million acres are sold.
In an exaggeration of the classic Friday-afternoon news dump, the Cheney Administration announced these plans on Election Day. They didn't even tell the National Park Service until it was a done deal.
Frances Beinecke, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council, writing in Huffington Post:
The NRDC and other environmental groups are fighting this, of course, and our help is needed. Please click here to send a message to the Bureau of Land Management, along with the Obama transition team, and, if you're USian, your Senators and Congresspeople.
Whether you're Canadian, USian or from anywhere else, this land-grab should matter to you. Perhaps it's inevitable that every majestic landscape on the planet, every wilderness area, every canyon and glacier and mountain, will one day be stripped for its fossil-fuel profit potential. But we have a duty to fight to slow or stop that destruction every step of the way.
Please send a mesasge of protest today.
Unless Bushco's fossil-fuels gang is stopped, lands near Canyonlands National Parks, Arches National Parks and Dinosaur National Monument, will be turned over to the highest bidder, then turned into an industrial wasteland. Subsequent auctions will follow, until the leases on 6.4 million acres are sold.
In an exaggeration of the classic Friday-afternoon news dump, the Cheney Administration announced these plans on Election Day. They didn't even tell the National Park Service until it was a done deal.
Frances Beinecke, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council, writing in Huffington Post:
I thought I couldn't be shocked any more. After all, the past eight years have taught me that despite the availability of clean energy technology, the Bush administration will always place oil and gas drilling above all other options.
But still I was caught by surprise when the Bureau of Land Management announced it plans to hand over 6.4 million acres of public lands near some of Utah's most famous national parks to oil and gas companies.
This parting gift to energy executives - the equivalent of swag at the end of Bush's long, industry-crammed bacchanal - hit a new low. Here is why.
1. Utah's Redrock Country Is One-of-a-Kind
While it may look like an empty expanse on the map, Southern Utah is full of fantastical landscapes that can be seen nowhere else.
I first journeyed there after college, when nothing in my East Coast background prepared me for the red, sinuous canyon walls, the fine pink sand, the wind-sculpted rock towers--or the rattlesnake I almost sat on after a dip in a cool wash. I don't get to return as often as I like, but the memory of lying on smooth slick rock like a lizard basking in the sun rejuvenates me still.
2. The Public Uses This Public Land
Southern Utah is a mecca for Patagonia-clad rock climbers and diehard river rats, but they aren't the only ones who feel its pull. Families flock to the area for spectacular and inexpensive vacations. In the fall, the region is full of senior citizens enjoying our nation's accessible natural heritage.
If the BLM has its way, those vacations will look a lot different. Imagine traveling to see world-famous Delicate Arch in Arches National Park, only to have your experience of high-desert beauty marred by industrial drill sites just 1.3 miles away from the arch.
Other favorite sites are vulnerable as well. The BLM wants to lease land next to:
• Dinosaur National Park, where dinosaur-loving children watch paleontologists at work on active digs
• Desolation Canyon on the Green River, a favorite of boaters since John Wesley Powell wrote about it in 1896
• Nine Mile Canyon, an outdoor gallery covered with rock art that sheds light on life among the Anasazi
• Slick Rock Trail, the route that made Moab a center of mountain biking
3. Not Just Scattered Drill Pads, But an Industrial Network
Exploration may start with drill sites here and there, but then those sites get connected by a massive overlay of pipelines, pump stations, and maintenance roads. Remember, this is country where you can see for 40, 60, even 100 miles. The oil and gas infrastructure likely will not be hidden by a ridgeline or forest; it will be exposed for all to see and hear.
You might hike through the utter quiet of Canyonlands National Park - a stillness that has been lost from most of our lives - only to climb a plateau and have the silence shattered by the constant, throbbing sound of a natural gas compressor station.
4. Efficiency Yields More Jobs than Utah's 1 Percent of US Oil
Some argue that Utah's wilderness values are trumped by our need for more oil and gas. But Utah has only 2.5 percent of the nation's natural gas and less than 1 percent of oil reserves.
We will get far better results by tapping into America's stores of energy efficiency. Using better insulation in our homes and offices, keeping tires pumped to the proper weight, and shifting to highly efficient plug-in hybrid cars--these are the measures that will not only reduce our reliance on oil and gas, but also create far more jobs in America than the fossil fuel industry can (see this UMass study).
The NRDC and other environmental groups are fighting this, of course, and our help is needed. Please click here to send a message to the Bureau of Land Management, along with the Obama transition team, and, if you're USian, your Senators and Congresspeople.
Whether you're Canadian, USian or from anywhere else, this land-grab should matter to you. Perhaps it's inevitable that every majestic landscape on the planet, every wilderness area, every canyon and glacier and mountain, will one day be stripped for its fossil-fuel profit potential. But we have a duty to fight to slow or stop that destruction every step of the way.
Please send a mesasge of protest today.
12.10.2008
what i'm watching: the visitor, persepolis, philip seymour hoffman, electric car, more
We saw a terrific movie this week, which you won't want to miss: "The Visitor," written and directed by Thomas McCarthy. McCarthy directed another favourite movie of mine, "The Station Agent".
The Visitor is both a personal and a political story, and the two are seamlessly woven together. As someone who is always trying to do that in my own writing, I can tell you it's incredibly difficult, and seldom achieved as well as McCarthy did here.
The movie is about people coming out of their own isolation and pain by reaching out to others, by feeling responsible to the people around them. Loneliness is broken by making connections deeper than the appearances that divide us, and music is a road on which those connections travel. The movie is also about immigration, detention and deportation, and what those words mean in human terms.
Excellent acting, excellent writing, poignant and sad, but hopeful and uplifting. Don't miss it.
Update: Another reason I loved this movie, which I forgot to mention earlier. It's a great New York City movie. None of this filmed-in-Toronto-fake-New-York stuff here. It made me a little homesick, which means it was the real deal.
* * * *
Quick wrap-up of Movie Season so far, in reverse order:
Reservation Road: Good, not great. Good concept and some decent writing, but once the premise was played out, there was nowhere to go.
The Visitor: Excellent, a must-see.
Persepolis: Excellent. Another personal and political story.
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead: Very good, very suspenseful, another amazing performance by the ubiquitous PSH. (Those of us who watch independent films have been tracking his career with amazement for a long, long time.)
Who Killed the Electric Car?: Not stellar in documentary terms, but a real eye-opener, full of important information and worth seeing.
Charlie Wilson's War: Very good. Some interesting insights into how foreign policy is and is not made.
There Will Be Blood: Hated it. Even Daniel Day-Lewis's typically excellent performance wasn't enough to make up for this mess of a movie.
Dan in Real Life: Nice romantic comedy, entertaining, and some really nice acting. I like good romantic comedies, but seldom find them.
I'm Not There: Terrible. Once you get over the concept (various people playing Bob Dylan, including a black child and a woman), it's a bunch of long-disproved Dylan myths and cliches strung together.
Run, Fat Boy, Run: Loved it. Funny and sweet without being cloying. I imagine Simon Pegg will make a bad movie one day, but he hasn't done it yet.
On deck: When the Levees Broke. Kind of crazy that we haven't seen this yet, I know.
The Visitor is both a personal and a political story, and the two are seamlessly woven together. As someone who is always trying to do that in my own writing, I can tell you it's incredibly difficult, and seldom achieved as well as McCarthy did here.
The movie is about people coming out of their own isolation and pain by reaching out to others, by feeling responsible to the people around them. Loneliness is broken by making connections deeper than the appearances that divide us, and music is a road on which those connections travel. The movie is also about immigration, detention and deportation, and what those words mean in human terms.
Excellent acting, excellent writing, poignant and sad, but hopeful and uplifting. Don't miss it.
Update: Another reason I loved this movie, which I forgot to mention earlier. It's a great New York City movie. None of this filmed-in-Toronto-fake-New-York stuff here. It made me a little homesick, which means it was the real deal.
* * * *
Quick wrap-up of Movie Season so far, in reverse order:
Reservation Road: Good, not great. Good concept and some decent writing, but once the premise was played out, there was nowhere to go.
The Visitor: Excellent, a must-see.
Persepolis: Excellent. Another personal and political story.
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead: Very good, very suspenseful, another amazing performance by the ubiquitous PSH. (Those of us who watch independent films have been tracking his career with amazement for a long, long time.)
Who Killed the Electric Car?: Not stellar in documentary terms, but a real eye-opener, full of important information and worth seeing.
Charlie Wilson's War: Very good. Some interesting insights into how foreign policy is and is not made.
There Will Be Blood: Hated it. Even Daniel Day-Lewis's typically excellent performance wasn't enough to make up for this mess of a movie.
Dan in Real Life: Nice romantic comedy, entertaining, and some really nice acting. I like good romantic comedies, but seldom find them.
I'm Not There: Terrible. Once you get over the concept (various people playing Bob Dylan, including a black child and a woman), it's a bunch of long-disproved Dylan myths and cliches strung together.
Run, Fat Boy, Run: Loved it. Funny and sweet without being cloying. I imagine Simon Pegg will make a bad movie one day, but he hasn't done it yet.
On deck: When the Levees Broke. Kind of crazy that we haven't seen this yet, I know.
12.09.2008
two new, scary, cliched thoughts on a liberal-ndp coalition
The prospect of a coalition between my party of choice and an Ignatieff-led Liberal Party has got me thinking of two cliches.
"Be careful what you wish for."
and
"You lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas."
I will still agitate for a coalition to stop Harper. But now it's quite a bit scarier.
"Be careful what you wish for."
and
"You lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas."
I will still agitate for a coalition to stop Harper. But now it's quite a bit scarier.
note to michael ignatieff supporters who are visiting wmtc
I have read many articles by Mr. Ignatieff that were published in the New York Times Magazine.
My low opinion of Mr. Ignatieff was formed by reading his own words, in long, in-depth stories. He helped make the case for pre-emptive invasion, he supports the use of torture, he supports overthrowing governments to install new regimes. This comes from the man's own words.
Some links were posted in comments in this thread, but they are only a small sample of what I've read.
Again: my judgement of this man was formed by reading his own words. Got it? Thanks.
Update: A reader alerts me that on a pro-Ignatieff blog, I am listed, along with a bunch of other people, as a "Rae Liberal". Do these people bother to read before they write? (Silly question, I know.) Earth to trolls: I am not a "Rae Liberal". I am not a Liberal at all!
Upperdate: Go look up the definition of "smear campaign". You will find it does not mention quoting the person's own published, well-chosen words.
My low opinion of Mr. Ignatieff was formed by reading his own words, in long, in-depth stories. He helped make the case for pre-emptive invasion, he supports the use of torture, he supports overthrowing governments to install new regimes. This comes from the man's own words.
Some links were posted in comments in this thread, but they are only a small sample of what I've read.
Again: my judgement of this man was formed by reading his own words. Got it? Thanks.
Update: A reader alerts me that on a pro-Ignatieff blog, I am listed, along with a bunch of other people, as a "Rae Liberal". Do these people bother to read before they write? (Silly question, I know.) Earth to trolls: I am not a "Rae Liberal". I am not a Liberal at all!
Upperdate: Go look up the definition of "smear campaign". You will find it does not mention quoting the person's own published, well-chosen words.
time to bombard ignatieff with pro-coalition messages
By now you've all heard that Bob Rae has dropped out of the Liberal leadership contest. This is a big disappointment to me, but we can't waste time on disappointment.
It would hurt to see the left cut a deal with a pro-war, pro-torture apologist for U.S. foreign policy...
Geez. Just read that over. Kind of leaves a hollow pit in your stomach, doesn't it?
...but if Ignatieff represents the Liberal platform, and the coalition accord is specific to economic issues, I can live with it. I have to live with it to get rid of the Conservatives, and I have to count on the NDP to stay who they are.
That may be a lot to hope for, but I've got plenty of hope.
Write, call and email the offices of Michael Ignatieff. Tell him we want a Liberal-NDP coalition!
Etobicoke: 416.251.5510
Ottawa: 613.995.9364
Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca
Also: if you have a Liberal or NDP MP, email and call them, too.
Tell them we are the majority and we believe the coalition is best for us, and best for Canada!
It would hurt to see the left cut a deal with a pro-war, pro-torture apologist for U.S. foreign policy...
Geez. Just read that over. Kind of leaves a hollow pit in your stomach, doesn't it?
...but if Ignatieff represents the Liberal platform, and the coalition accord is specific to economic issues, I can live with it. I have to live with it to get rid of the Conservatives, and I have to count on the NDP to stay who they are.
That may be a lot to hope for, but I've got plenty of hope.
Write, call and email the offices of Michael Ignatieff. Tell him we want a Liberal-NDP coalition!
Etobicoke: 416.251.5510
Ottawa: 613.995.9364
Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca
Also: if you have a Liberal or NDP MP, email and call them, too.
Tell them we are the majority and we believe the coalition is best for us, and best for Canada!
12.08.2008
the coalition is worth fighting for
I'm sick of hearing that the coalition is dead. Until it's officially withdrawn, until both parties announce definitely that there will be no coalition, I'm still fighting for it.
Why shouldn't we? Why not keep fighting for what we want? Because we're afraid of being wrong? Who gives a shit. We should be more afraid of not being heard. We should be more afraid of ending up with another Conservative government.
Here's the latest (English portion only) from Canadians for a Progressive Coalition.
+ + + +
Hello - bonjour,
This is a crucial moment. We must act together to reach out and build a new era of cooperative governance in Canada.
Last week fear spread faster than facts. We have learned that the Conservatives have a massive, well-funded, and impressively effective political machine. This machine swamped Canadians with unfounded fears about democracy and national unity. The Conservative machine is going to fully mobilize over the coming weeks in an attempt to discredit a progressive coalition - and with it the Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois, unions, and all other progressive Canadians. It will be incredibly important for us to debunk these myths in the weeks ahead.
Progressives have the numbers, the skills, and the creativity to turn this around, and make this the beginning of a new era of cooperative politics in Canada. In one week we have worked together to gain over 30,000 signatures on our petition, 20,000 members on Facebook, 24,000 views of our YouTube video, 11,000 emails in our mailing list, balanced dozens of media stories, and organized successful events across the country. Other campaigns, such as Make Parliament Work and 62% Majority, have also emerged and effectively promoted the coalition.
What can we accomplish by January 26th when Parliament reconvenes?
To start, this week we must tell our MPs that we still support a progressive coalition, we must tell our friends and family that we still support a progressive coalition, and we must organize together to make a progressive coalition a reality for Canada.
This week Canadians for a Progressive Coalition will:
1. Show the progressive parties the broad, non-partisan, and cross-Canada support for a progressive coalition.
2. Turn Progressive Coalition into a central hub for news, resources, and tools for the progressive coalition movement.
3. Build a national organization with strong regional hubs and local groups, along with teams for communications, videos, research, and others, to organize outreach and events across the country over the coming weeks.
What can you do right now?
1. Write your progressive MP to tell them that you support a progressive coalition. The Conservatives are flooding their inboxes - they need to hear from you. You can find their contact information quickly at this link.
2. Write or talk with your friends and family about why you are supporting a progressive coalition. You are the best messenger. Be personal and try to reach as many people as you can. Show them our website, progressivecoalition.ca and our petition. Write campaign@progressivecoalition.ca about any concerns they have so we can respond to them effectively.
3. Get involved. Do you want to organize in your local area or region? Do you have communication, research, web, video, fundraising, or event planning skills? Email us at campaign@progressivecoalition.ca with your area of interest, your location, and your experience and we will connect you with the right team.
4. Please check the website daily, even if you have already signed the petition, to follow the latest news, find out about events happening in your area, and find out what we and other groups are doing. This site will be updated continually in the upcoming weeks.
5. Write letters to the editor, call in to radio shows, and post comments on news stories and blogs. The Conservatives have been kind enough to provide us with an incredibly powerful tool to find the local media in our areas. Feel free to use it.
6. Donate. So far our campaign has operated on donations from a few volunteers. To be effective, we will need your help. We have set up a PayPal donation link at the bottom of our website.
Together, we can do this!
Cheers,
The Canadians for a Progressive Coalition Team
+ + + +
Why shouldn't we? Why not keep fighting for what we want? Because we're afraid of being wrong? Who gives a shit. We should be more afraid of not being heard. We should be more afraid of ending up with another Conservative government.
Here's the latest (English portion only) from Canadians for a Progressive Coalition.
+ + + +
Hello - bonjour,
This is a crucial moment. We must act together to reach out and build a new era of cooperative governance in Canada.
Last week fear spread faster than facts. We have learned that the Conservatives have a massive, well-funded, and impressively effective political machine. This machine swamped Canadians with unfounded fears about democracy and national unity. The Conservative machine is going to fully mobilize over the coming weeks in an attempt to discredit a progressive coalition - and with it the Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois, unions, and all other progressive Canadians. It will be incredibly important for us to debunk these myths in the weeks ahead.
Progressives have the numbers, the skills, and the creativity to turn this around, and make this the beginning of a new era of cooperative politics in Canada. In one week we have worked together to gain over 30,000 signatures on our petition, 20,000 members on Facebook, 24,000 views of our YouTube video, 11,000 emails in our mailing list, balanced dozens of media stories, and organized successful events across the country. Other campaigns, such as Make Parliament Work and 62% Majority, have also emerged and effectively promoted the coalition.
What can we accomplish by January 26th when Parliament reconvenes?
To start, this week we must tell our MPs that we still support a progressive coalition, we must tell our friends and family that we still support a progressive coalition, and we must organize together to make a progressive coalition a reality for Canada.
This week Canadians for a Progressive Coalition will:
1. Show the progressive parties the broad, non-partisan, and cross-Canada support for a progressive coalition.
2. Turn Progressive Coalition into a central hub for news, resources, and tools for the progressive coalition movement.
3. Build a national organization with strong regional hubs and local groups, along with teams for communications, videos, research, and others, to organize outreach and events across the country over the coming weeks.
What can you do right now?
1. Write your progressive MP to tell them that you support a progressive coalition. The Conservatives are flooding their inboxes - they need to hear from you. You can find their contact information quickly at this link.
2. Write or talk with your friends and family about why you are supporting a progressive coalition. You are the best messenger. Be personal and try to reach as many people as you can. Show them our website, progressivecoalition.ca and our petition. Write campaign@progressivecoalition.ca about any concerns they have so we can respond to them effectively.
3. Get involved. Do you want to organize in your local area or region? Do you have communication, research, web, video, fundraising, or event planning skills? Email us at campaign@progressivecoalition.ca with your area of interest, your location, and your experience and we will connect you with the right team.
4. Please check the website daily, even if you have already signed the petition, to follow the latest news, find out about events happening in your area, and find out what we and other groups are doing. This site will be updated continually in the upcoming weeks.
5. Write letters to the editor, call in to radio shows, and post comments on news stories and blogs. The Conservatives have been kind enough to provide us with an incredibly powerful tool to find the local media in our areas. Feel free to use it.
6. Donate. So far our campaign has operated on donations from a few volunteers. To be effective, we will need your help. We have set up a PayPal donation link at the bottom of our website.
Together, we can do this!
Cheers,
The Canadians for a Progressive Coalition Team
+ + + +
does ignatieff as liberal leader spell the end of our hopes?
I never blog about partisan political maneuverings. It's just not my thing.
But privately, I have been hoping against hope that Bob Rae would be chosen as the next leader of the Liberal party. I worry about his baggage, sure, but I'm betting - or hoping - that most people so bothered by The Baggage Factor would be voting Conservative anyway.
However, Michael Ignatieff as Liberal leader would seem to spell the death of the Liberal-NDP Coalition.
Speaking strictly from an NDP perspective, how can the New Democrats ask us to support someone who laboured for years to promote destructive US foreign policy, including the invasion of Iraq and torture of anyone declared a terrorism suspect?
Although Ignatieff backed away from his stance on Iraq, his writing, especially his frequent features in the New York Times, show his true colours very clearly. I used to read his work - or try to, repulsed as I was by his war-mongering - before I knew he was Canadian, and before I knew I was moving to Canada. I expressed my thoughts on Michael Ignatieff two years ago, and nothing has changed.
We could have lived with Stéphane Dion until May. We could have lived with Bob Rae. But Ignatieff as Liberal leader and the end of the coalition would be a crushing defeat to our hopes for change. I hope I am wrong.
But privately, I have been hoping against hope that Bob Rae would be chosen as the next leader of the Liberal party. I worry about his baggage, sure, but I'm betting - or hoping - that most people so bothered by The Baggage Factor would be voting Conservative anyway.
However, Michael Ignatieff as Liberal leader would seem to spell the death of the Liberal-NDP Coalition.
Speaking strictly from an NDP perspective, how can the New Democrats ask us to support someone who laboured for years to promote destructive US foreign policy, including the invasion of Iraq and torture of anyone declared a terrorism suspect?
Although Ignatieff backed away from his stance on Iraq, his writing, especially his frequent features in the New York Times, show his true colours very clearly. I used to read his work - or try to, repulsed as I was by his war-mongering - before I knew he was Canadian, and before I knew I was moving to Canada. I expressed my thoughts on Michael Ignatieff two years ago, and nothing has changed.
We could have lived with Stéphane Dion until May. We could have lived with Bob Rae. But Ignatieff as Liberal leader and the end of the coalition would be a crushing defeat to our hopes for change. I hope I am wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


