what i'm reading: man's search for meaning by viktor frankl

I've just finished reading Man's Search for Meaning, a classic written by Dr. Viktor E. Frankl in 1959, republished with various forewords and epilogues in 1984, 1992, and 2006. It's a book I had long wanted to read but had forgotten about, until I saw it on the Mississauga Library System's "Raves and Faves" display, adult nonfiction division.

Frankl, who died in 1997, was a neurologist, a psychiatrist, and a therapist. He was also a Holocaust survivor whose entire family perished in the Nazi death camps. The original German title of Man's Search for Meaning is translated into English as Nevertheless, Say "Yes" to Life: A Psychologist Experiences the Concentration Camp.

* * * *

Man's Search for Meaning is divided into two parts. In the first part, Frankl recounts some memories of his own experience in Nazi concentration camps. There, he became a keen observer of how people survived - in the differences between who survived and who didn't, who managed to retain some measure of dignity, who adhered to their own moral code despite being surrounded by immorality and degradation, and who became brutal themselves, who lost the will to live.

This section was, of course, difficult to read, but it was also fascinating. Although I have thought extensively about the Holocaust, I mainly have thought of concentration camps as death camps: places where people were exterminated in mass numbers. Clearly they were that, but they were also forced-labour camps. Frankl relates how he and the other men were forced into slave labour under unimaginably brutal conditions - starving, sick, exposed to the elements, in constant danger of being beaten or murdered, in constant danger of being still further humiliated. Frankl draws one of the clearest pictures of slavery you will read anywhere.

Woven into these descriptions are firsthand accounts of choices made by both inmates and overseers - because, although no one could choose their conditions, everyone, Frankl believes, could choose how they reacted to those conditions. These are stories of small moments of courage, dignity, and heroism, as well as of the descent into sadism and brutality.

* * * *

In the second part of the book, Frankl describes his theory of human experience and the therapy derived from that theory, both derived (in part) from his experiences in the concentration camps. (Frankl had begun working on the theory and the book before being captured by the Nazis.)

I can't write about Frankl's theory impartially, because it dovetails perfectly with my own worldview, and confirms so many of my core beliefs. According to Frankl, humans' greatest driving force - the primary, most powerful motivation in our lives - is the will to meaning. The school of therapy he founded, logotherapy, is based on the premise that humans must find purpose and meaning in their own lives, and that many psychological problems can be traced to a lack of meaning and purpose.

Frankl himself was a believer in his own religion, and apparently many people find spiritual meaning in his book, but Man's Search for Meaning is not spiritual or religious. Indeed, logotherapy is not prescriptive and does not proselytize. In logotherapy, the role of the therapist is to help people discover their own purpose, not to assign a purpose to them.

* * * *

The search for meaning in life is not an abstraction, not the same as the so-called "meaning of life". Frankl writes:
For the meaning of life differs from man to man, from day to day and from hour to hour. What matters, therefore, is not the meaning of life in general but rather the specific meaning of a person's life at a given moment. To put the question in general terms would be comparable to the question posed to a chess champion: "Tell me, Master, what is the best move in the world?"
Each person's meaning, and the path through which they discover it, is unique to that individual. That meaning is dynamic and fluid, and will change many times over the course of a lifetime. There is no blueprint of a search for meaning. But, according to logotherapy, humans discover meaning in their life in one of three ways. Meaning is discovered through deeds and acts, through love, and through suffering.
Thus far we have shown that the meaning of life always changes, but that it never ceases to be. According to logotherapy, we can discover this meaning in life in three different ways: (1) by creating a work or doing a deed; (2) by experiencing something or encountering someone; and (3) by the attitude we take towards unavoidable suffering.
The first path is self-explanatory. By the second path, Frankl means the experience of truth, beauty, art, nature, culture, or any other enriching experience, and he means the experience of love. The third path - the attitude we take to suffering - might stop you for a moment, as it did me. How can suffering have meaning? Shouldn't suffering be prevented? Must we suffer to find meaning?

Frankl answers the latter questions unequivocally. If we can prevent suffering, or remove the cause of suffering, we should and we must. Suffering is not a necessary pre-condition to meaning. There is no crucible of fire through which we all must pass in order to find liberation.

However, life can be full of suffering. There is pain in ordinary existence. And through that suffering, there is potential for meaning and purpose. Whenever a person says, "I'm not glad it happened, but I learned and grew so much from the experience," she has found meaning through suffering.

Every one of us, myself included, who has discovered growth through personal loss or just plain hard times has lived this precept. War resisters who feel compelled to speak out against war, rape survivors who volunteer in a crisis centre, recovering substance abusers who become sponsors - these are all examples of finding meaning in suffering.

The meaning found through suffering needn't be activism, it need not be altruistic or charitable. It could be enjoying a rich and beautiful day with a loved one, despite having cancer. It could be deciding to adopt another animal after the loss of a beloved dog or cat. It could be deciding to take better care of oneself after an illness.

Finding meaning in suffering is more than making the best of a bad situation. It's understanding that conflict and pain are also opportunities for growth and personal development - opportunities we would never choose, but which ultimately become part of our strength and our purpose. Because, Frankl believes, humans never lose free will. We can seldom choose our conditions, but we can always choose how we react to those conditions. That is a central teaching of logotherapy.

Several important points made in Frankl's book have become contemporary cliches - overused to the point of having lost all meaning. But that overuse occurred in a different time and context, and shouldn't be held against Frankl. He quotes the German philosopher Nietzsche in two important points, which you will recognize from cubicle decorations and pop-psychology-speak. That which doesn't kill me makes me stronger. and If a man has a why, he can withstand any how. Cliches, yes. But for many people, simple truisms.

* * * *

In one of the recent updates of this book, Frankl writes of a drug crisis, of people "turning to drugs" because their lives lack meaning. Leaving that aside, I would add that consumer culture leads people to "turn to shopping" for the same reasons. To me it seems clear that consumer culture promotes a life devoid of meaning, what Frankl would call an existential vacuum. People seek to fill that vacuum through consumerism - buy, buy, buy, more, more, more - and through celebrity worship. This is a great boon to the ruling class, who profit by our consumption, our ignorance, and our apathy.

Many people, however, cannot nurture the meaning in their own lives because they are too busy trying to survive. This, then, brings us back to finding meaning in suffering. Every person who is organizing - against water privatization, seed theft, pension theft - against evictions and austerity - every person fighting for a living wage, for child care, for public healthcare and education - is finding meaning from suffering.

* * * *

Some of the language in Man's Search for Meaning is outdated, and some of the scenarios seem old-fashioned. For example, a disabled man is described as "crippled". Yet Frankl uses this "crippled" man as an example of a person leading a rich and meaningful life, which would have made him very progressive in his era. He uses the word "man" generically, where today we would use more inclusive, gender-neutral language. The need to make minor mental updates shouldn't detract from the value of this book. Man's Search for Meaning is a rich and rewarding read.


Stephanie said...

Wow, this takes me back to highschool when Victor Frankl's "Man's Search for Meaning" was required reading in a senior world religions course. That book has always stayed with me and remains influential in my life.

Now, I think it is time to reread it. Thanks.

laura k said...

That book has always stayed with me and remains influential in my life.

How cool. I was telling Allan that I wish I could remember how I heard of this book, what made me think I should read it. I must have come upon it when I was reading about existentialism, a consequence of exploring atheism.

Hooray for my library's Raves & Faves, always pointing out interesting reads. And hooray for a high school class with worthwhile reading!

laura k said...

A thought I didn't include in this post...

At various times in the past, when people have asked about my writing in relation to income potential - do I want to write a screenplay, do I try to earn money from my blog, why don't I write a book with a famous person I know, etc. etc. - I often have a difficult time explaining why decisions about my writing are never based on money.

I have been similarly questioned about activism or volunteer work. If I enjoy this thing, why don't I choose it as a career.

At some point, the person will almost always characterize the writing or the actions as a "hobby," which I feel minimizes its importance.

As a way out of this difficult conversation, I have come to say, "It's what gives my life meaning."

Invariably, the person immediately understands.

laura k said...

Further to this point, during the time Allan and I were publishing and publicizing his first book, a friend asked me how many copies we had to sell to break even financially, and would Allan be upset if he sold less than that amount.

I had a difficult time explaining that we didn't keep track of sales, except in the sense of wanting the natural audience to find the book. I had no idea how much money it had cost us to produce, and neither of us cared.

She really did not believe me. I remember her saying, "Really? Even after all this work you've put into it?", as in, come on now, be serious.

Only when I used that same expression, "This is what gives our lives meaning" did she say, yes, I understand and believe me.

johngoldfine said...

"I had no idea how much money it had cost us to produce, and neither of us cared."

Drop "to produce" and you pretty much have my attitude toward horses and, even more, dogs. It sounds pathetic to my own ears, but dogs give my life meaning.

laura k said...

It doesn't sound pathetic to me. It sounds completely wonderful.

In a different sense than (I think) you mean, my dogs also give my life meaning. Why else would I go to all the trouble? ;) But seriously, for me it is love, and it is the perfect family for me. I understand completely.

(Re my earlier comments, I did love to earn money through my writing - but only if all my other criteria for a writing assignment were met. Last on the list.)

M@ said...

I clearly have to read this book. It sounds like it would be useful to me (and these days questions about meaning are very much on my mind). I just bought the e-book and I think I'll enjoy it.

I also like the critique of consumerism you've brought in -- very astute. (I've become more sensitive to consumerism in reading your comments about it over time. It's an issue that our society desperately needs to start confronting and rectifying.)

On the question of concentration camps, Dwight McDonald pointed out that the camp was the most important institution invented in the first half of the 20th century, and I think he's right -- the politics of the 1930s and 1940s are partially defined by this institution. And concentration camps were not necessarily the same as death camps. There were concentration camps in many countries (including, to our great and enduring national shame, Canada), but death camps were a uniquely Nazi invention. I'm looking forward to reading Frankl's account, because it's been a fascinating subject for me for a long time. (And horrifying, honestly.)

Btw, I would say that the temporary jail facilities used during the G20 were roughly analogous to a concentration camp. I say this not because I think it's legitimate to compare the G20 authorities to Nazis, but because those jail facilities were a political institution, not a criminal institution.

laura k said...

Thanks for your comments, M@. I'm so pleased to turn someone on to this book.

You're right, there's a distinction between the concentration camp and the death camp, and something distinct about using camps as tool of political repression.

I remember hearing my father refer to the Japanese internment camps as concentration camps. I protested at first, because I had only thought of concentration camps a la Nazis (I was a child at the time). He explained what "concentration camp" meant... which is why, all these years later, I refer to the prison at Guantanamo Bay that way.

By the way (did I put this in the Chris Hedges post?), Hedges mentioned your man McDonald as being brilliant and under-read, and also as having radicalized Noam Chomsky.

laura k said...

Also thanks for saying that re consumerism. Consumer culture, to me, is the opposite of meaning. A kind of negative meaning that only produces more emptiness, which people try to fill with more stuff, which leads to more emptiness.

canammike said...

This is the best book to read and learn from. Thanks for you comments about consumerism equaling negative meaning.