12.29.2013

what i'm reading: the immortal life of henrietta lacks, by rebecca skloot

I've just finished The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot. I’m sure many of you have read it, but if you have not, please run to your local library or bookstore or website and borrow, purchase, or download a copy immediately. This book is literary nonfiction of the highest order, a melding of social, cultural, and science history, and a triumph of research and writing.

Henrietta Lacks was an African-American woman, a poor tobacco farmer who lived near and in Baltimore. Henrietta died of cancer in 1951, at the age of 31. She left behind five children, destined for poverty and all manner of abuse. She also left behind, without her knowledge, some cancer cells that doctors at Johns Hopkins University Hospital removed for study. Those cells, and their descendants, would help Jonas Salk to develop the polio vaccine, and would continue to form the basis of cell research around the globe for decades, continuing to this day.

Those cancer cells and their descendants are known as HeLa, short for Henrietta Lacks. While HeLa cells were multiplying around the globe, while students and scientists and doctors were studying HeLa, injecting HeLa cells into every type of test imaginable, the Lacks family had no idea that cells were taken from their mother and that those cells lived on. Twenty years later, the knowledge would rock their world.

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is built around several intertwined stories. There's the story of Henrietta Lacks, the woman: her life, her illness, her suffering, her family, her death. There's the story of HeLa, the cells, and their incalculable contribution to medical science. And there's the story of Deborah Lacks, one of Henrietta's daughters, a complicated, troubled, compassionate, striving, indomitable woman who Skloot describes as the most resilient person she ever knew.

There are also the moral, ethical, and legal implications of the HeLa story. Although textbooks referred to Henrietta Lacks as the “donor” of HeLa cells, Henrietta was never informed that doctors were taking her cells, she was never asked, and was never able to give consent. This fact places Henrietta Lacks in the context of a complicated story of race, poverty, genetics, and human experimentation. Skloot unpacks these issues in the clearest and most compelling manner I can imagine.

And finally, there is the story of Rebecca Skloot, and her obsession that drove her to uncover the real story behind both Henrietta Lacks and HeLa, and to befriend Deborah Lacks. The two would form an unlikely and powerful bond that would change them both.

This is also a book full of subplots and minor threads, two of which I found particularly compelling, and unbelievably sad. One of Henrietta’s son, Deborah’s brother, was horrifically abused (tortured, really) after his mother's death. As an adult, he is violent and out of control, unable to master his constant anger. At one point in the book's narrative, he is sleeping on the street, signing up for medical experiments in exchange for food and a bed. In his story, we also get a glimpse of the transforming power of love and respect.

Another of Henrietta's children, and another subplot of the book, was Elsie, the sister Deborah never knew. Elsie had epilepsy, and at least partial deafness, and possibly other mental disabilities. When Henrietta could no longer care for her, the family talked her into putting Elsie in an institution. I'll stop there to avoid spoilers. Suffice to say Elsie's story was, for me, the very saddest part of this book.

One of the book's many fascinating subplots looks at the history of medical experiments on human subjects. Many of us are familiar with some of the more egregious examples of nonconsensual human experimentation, such as the Nazis performed on inmates of their death camps, or such as the Tuskegee experiments. But did you know that medical experiments were routinely performed on prison inmates in the U.S., without their consent? That patients in a hospital for a routine surgery might be injected with cancer cells, but told they were being inoculated against infection? The story of human experimentation without informed consent in the United States is shocking even to those of us who hold no illusions about that country.

The hidden history of how these hideous practices began to change - begun by an act of resistance from three doctors - is also fascinating. Scientists cried that informed consent would be the death of science, that without uninformed human subjects, all medical advancement would come to a halt - just as they claim today about experiments on animal subjects.

By coincidence, I recently read Home, Toni Morrison's 2012 novella, which touches on the so-called "Mississippi appendectomy," the forced sterilization of poor African-American women by white doctors. So when the Lacks family fears that the Johns Hopkins doctors did something evil to their mother, those fears must be seen in context of this very painful history. The review in The Guardian notes:
The dark, inhuman face of unpoliced science shows itself throughout this story, side by side with the bright face of discovery and humanitarian advance. The ironies are no less bitter because they are plain: today, Henrietta's descendants cannot afford health insurance. Henrietta was buried in an unmarked grave, in a cemetery with her black ancestors, and with white ancestors who, when the author inquired, would not acknowledge her.
Skloot’s journey with the Lacks family and the triumphant book that it produced are a nonfiction writer’s dream. Here the journalist’s story is not just about persistence and obsession (although it is certainly that) but also about patience, honesty, empathy, and trust. Skloot worked hard to win Deborah Lacks' trust - constantly and repeatedly - and both sides were amply rewarded.

14 comments:

James Redekop said...

The Little Atoms podcast interviewed Skloot a few years back.

laura k said...

Nice, thanks for the link.

deang said...

So glad you were finally able to read this book! I have passed it around to friends since I read it a year or so ago and everyone is moved by it. I agree with you about Elsie's story being the saddest part. I still can't get the image of what was done to her out of my head.

laura k said...

I keep thinking about how lonely she must have been.

I'm glad you've also read this book!

Amy said...

Great book on so many levels, as you said. I should re-read it, as I've already forgotten many of the details (like what happened to Elsie--I think I've repressed that part), but the essence of it sticks with me.

laura k said...

I find that's generally the case - remembering the essence but not the details. If you read a lot, that's the way it goes.

I will re-read books that I read long ago, especially great novels that I read as a young person that I want to experience as an adult. But other than that, I feel there's too much I want to read to re-read anything recent. Gotta move on to the next great read.

Amy said...

I rarely do re-read books for the same reason. I did re-read both Gatsby and Catcher in the Rye because I wanted to read them through the more adult perspective I have now as compared to my perspective when I read them 40 or so years ago.

I have found lately that there are fewer and fewer new works that I find "great." Most new fiction seems derivative of other works or just poorly written or too post-moderny for my taste.

laura k said...

I read 1984 every ten years - something I recommend highly. I've read The Grapes of Wrath a few times (I love it more each time), and recently re-read Hemingway before going to Spain. I have a few others like that, too.

It sounds like you're reading the wrong books! I have no interest in most popular fiction, but there are many great works out there, without a doubt. William Kennedy, Roddy Doyle, Toni Morrison, William Trevor, A. L. Kennedy, Colson Whitehead... and those are just off the top of my head. There are many many more truly great writers working today.

As a general rule, anytime one feels "There are no good ____ anymore" (films, books, art, buildings), that person is looking in the wrong place, or perhaps looking for repeats of the past. There is never any shortage of great art.

Amy said...

Other than Toni Morrison, I have not read anything by any of those authors, and several are completely unfamiliar to me! I guess I will have to do some investigating...

Thanks!

allan said...

I guess I will have to do some investigating...

This is good time for it, when many critics are posting best-of lists for 2013 (like Salon).

laura k said...

Those are my favourite fiction authors.

Other great writers still working, who I bet you haven't read all of: Philip Roth, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Mario Vargas Llosa, Doris Lessing.

More contemporary literary authors: Cormac McCarthy (esp. early work before he was super-famous), Jonathan Franzen, Ian McEwen, Zadie Smith (should be on my short list, above), Russell Banks (same), Richard Ford, Peter Carey, Mark Helperin, Barry Unsworth.

Widely celebrated writers that I haven't gotten to yet:

Edwidge Danticat, Colm Toibin, Margaret Laurence, Ann-Marie MacDonald, Isabel Allende... lots more but I'll stop now. :)

We live in a highly literary and literate age. There is so much excellent and original writing out there. Not all of it will be to your taste, of course, but all will be worth trying.

If you are interested in William Kennedy, Roddy Doyle, Colson Whitehead, or A. L. Kennedy - four of my favourite writers - I can recommend some titles or where to start.

laura k said...

This is good time for it, when many critics are posting best-of lists for 2013 (like Salon).

That is true, but you wouldn't want to limit yourself to books that were published in 2013 - although I have no doubt that the lists include many excellent books.

Amy said...

I have read a fair amount of Russell Banks (love him), Richard Ford (same), Roth (I do think I've read almost all of his works), and some of Helperin a long time ago. The others I will check out!

THANKS!

off to NYC for a few days

laura k said...

Excellent and you're most welcome! Have fun!!!