4.12.2011

how do we feel about the conservatives being caught with their pants down on the eve of the leaders' debate?

How happy are we about yesterday's leak of the Auditor General's report and the revelations that the Conservatives lied about Sheila Fraser's statements?


Hurrah for Joan Bryden and double hurrahs for whatever partisan angel leaked the Auditor General's report. And a special hurrah for the Conservatives' unlimited hubris and appetite for deception, which gave them the temerity to recycle and misuse Sheila Fraser's quote! Yes, chalk one up for Mr. Transparency and Accountability. This one is a bit difficult to spin away.

Joan Bryden, Canadian Press:
[Auditor General Sheila] Fraser's confidential Jan. 13 draft says the government misinformed Parliament to win approval for a $50-million G8 fund that lavished money on questionable projects in Industry Minister Tony Clement's riding.

And it suggests the process by which the funding was approved may have been illegal. ...

Among the questionable projects funded were:

* $274,000 on public toilets 20 km from the summit site.

* $100,000 on a gazebo an hour's drive away.

* $1.1-million for sidewalk and tree upgrades 100 km away.

* $194,000 for a park 100 km away.

* $745,000 on downtown improvements for three towns nearly 70 km away....


Steve Russell, Toronto Star:
The Star already revealed ahead of the twin summits last summer that much of the $50 million meant to spruce up the Huntsville location of the G8 went to irrelevant projects like gazebos and to raise sidewalks high enough to bury a fire hydrant far away from where the world leaders met.

Now comes word that Fraser concluded the Harper government misinformed Parliament, and skirted legal guidelines to approve the flow of $50 million into the G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund. That fund lavished money on dubious projects in a riding held by Conservative cabinet minister Tony Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka). ...

[T]here was no apparent regard for the needs of the summit or the financial guidelines laid down by the government.

The report provides campaign fodder for opposition critics who've long maintained the legacy fund was a thinly disguised slush fund for Clement. ...

"[P]arliament was misinformed," Fraser writes.


Kenyon Wallace, Toronto Star:
Much of the $50 million the Conservative government allocated to the G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund went to projects in Hunstville, Ont. that had nothing to do with the summit, according to newly released documents. . . .

The 32 projects that received funding, many of which appear to have no connection to the needs of the G8 summit, were chosen by Industry Minister Tony Clement, the mayor of Hunstville, and the general manager of Deerhurst Resort.

Rob Ferguson, Toronto Star (June 8, 2010):
On the shores of Georgian Bay, an hour west of the big world leaders' summit in Huntsville, the downtown sidewalks and fountain built with federal G8 funding are finished. . . .

Construction crews didn't raise a fire hydrant when they raised the level of a main downtown street and sidewalk ... the bright yellow hydrant sticks only about a foot out of the ground. A little low. ...


On a day when a $1.9 million "fake lake" in the G20 media centre in Toronto had opposition MPs and taxpayers crying foul, a quick spin north of the city revealed that almost everything north of Barrie was getting an upgrade — or so it seemed — for a summit that will last a matter of hours.

New sidewalks, trees, gazebos, paved roads, fresh coats of paint, gardens and all manner of buffing and polishing, all compliments of federal largesse, much of it for tiny towns well off the beaten track. . . .

Liberal MP Siobhan Coady: "(Taxpayers paid) $1.1 million for a sidewalk that is 84 kilometres from the summit site."


Daniel Leblance, Campbell Clark and Anna Mehler Paperny, Globe and Mail:
Ms. Fraser criticizes the government for a lack of openness toward Parliament, which unwittingly voted for the program as part of a border infrastructure initiative. . . The draft report also leaves the Harper government exposed to charges of financial mismanagement in the $50-million program, which had a budget 10 times higher than the funding allocated to major summits in Quebec City and Kananaskis, Alta. ...

The Auditor-General found no one in government who could explain how the funding was allocated.

Mark Kennedy and Amy Minsky, Vancouver Sun:
[T]he Conservative government failed to adequately keep records to explain how the 32 projects were chosen for Parry Sound-Muskoka, the southern Ontario riding represented by Tony Clement, the industry minister.

The federal campaign was hit with a bombshell in media reports that said Sheila Fraser concluded in a draft audit prepared in mid-January that the government had misinformed MPs and perhaps had even broken the law through the way it sought funds in late 2009. ...

[Conservatives] folded the $50 million into a larger, $83-million category, which was described as a Border Infrastructure Fund ... with no mention made of how much of the money was actually going to Parry Sound-Muskoka, which is nowhere near the border.

Les Whittington, Toronto Star:
Auditor General Sheila Fraser is rebuking the Conservatives for using an old quote of hers praising the Liberals as proof she approved of last year's G8/G20 spending by the Tories.

In another twist in the summit spending uproar, Fraser is demanding that the quote cited by the Tories be removed from a recent report by a Commons committee that studied how the Harper government spent $1.2 billion on the Muskoka and Toronto summits.

"We found that the processes and controls around that were very good and that the monies were spent as they were intended to be spent," Fraser is quoted as saying in the dissenting report written by Conservative MPs on the committee.

But Fraser says bluntly in a letter to former chair and Liberal candidate John McKay that the quote had nothing to do with last year's summits. It was taken from a 2010 media report referring to the auditor general's assessment of national security spending by the Liberal government in the wake of Sept. 11, 2001, she says. ...

[Fraser also pointed out] that she did not give testimony before the Commons government operations committee during its investigation of G8/G20 spending ...

All this happiness over what may or may not be a turning point in the election? Yes, and why not! Imagine how we'll celebrate on the night of May 2 if we've seen the end of the Harper Government™!

Allan and Laura co-post - thanks to Allan for the gifs

8 comments:

M@ said...

I don't know if we're going to see a change in the election momentum right now, but with the debates this week, this is (apparently) when a lot of people tune into the elections. This stuff couldn't have come out at a better time.

I was at an all-candidates event this morning. The room was positively hostile towards the CPC incumbent. I am starting to hope.

James said...

Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch. At least north of the border.

laura k said...

I was at an all-candidates event this morning. The room was positively hostile towards the CPC incumbent. I am starting to hope.

This is great news, especially given where you live.

I am hopeful, too. Psyched for the debate, starting right now.

impudent strumpet said...

WTF is Elaine wearing in that picture? It looks like a dress with pants??? #LeastImportantThing

laura k said...

She's wearing loose pants, kind of like capris, but I'm not sure if they're called capris when they're loose, with a loose layered top and vest. She still had a funky look in those days.

I believe she just got home from Paris, that's why they're so excited.

Scott M. said...

I would like to know who leaked the first draft to the Canadian Press.

We know the Conservative party leaked the second draft.

We also know John Baird has seen a copy of the second draft.

The thing that few seem to be focusing on -- NO ONE should have seen the drafts, other than a few choice bureaucrats. This is a major leak and illegal under the Official Secrets Act.

I have no clue why John Baird would admit to that, but he has.

The documents are numbered though so if the AG can get a copy of them they'll know who's responsible right away.

People should go to jail for this.

Gunner said...

... but but that couldn't be. The Conservatives promised a more honest and open government, it's almost like they might have been lying through their teeth and Harper looks like such an honest fellow he wouldn't lie.

In a totally unrelated vein, do I use sarcasm too much?

Some Person said...

I already have yet another party planned for when something momentous might happen in Canadian politics, by accident I must add. Hmmm...