4.13.2009

from manitoba: let them stay

Two newspapers in Manitoba - The Central Plains Herald Leader and the Portage Daily Graphic - have picked up Paul Copeland's excellent piece in support of war resisters. If you agree that US war resisters should be allowed to remain in Canada, and you live in Manitoba, perhaps you will write a letter to the editor with your views. Addresses below.

In case you didn't see this the other day, here's a re-run.
Iraq War resisters should be allowed to stay in Canada
by Paul Copeland

The Harper government attempts to justify deporting U.S. Iraq War resisters with a familiar, but untrue, narrative. They say that unlike during the Vietnam War, U.S. soldiers are now volunteers and are not considered refugees by the United Nations. They say refugee applications are evaluated fairly on their own merits, and there is no need to create a separate program for U.S. Iraq War resisters.

All these statements are false.

Firstly, not all Vietnam War resisters were conscripts, and many Iraq War resisters are redeployed against their will. Vietnam War resisters included draft dodgers who fled before induction, those who accepted their draft notice and were inducted, and those who voluntarily joined the military services. After a brief political struggle in 1969 concerning those who came to Canada after induction, Canada welcomed both groups without distinction. Although current war resisters volunteered and some completed their service, many found themselves involuntarily redeployed to Iraq. Programs of Stop-Loss and Individual Ready Reserve recall soldiers after they have been discharged. Many soldiers, like Jeremy Hinzman, have had their applications for conscientious objector status denied.

Secondly, it is not true the UN does not consider war resisters refugees. Section 167 of the UNHCR Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status states: “a deserter or draft-evader may also be considered a refugee if it can be shown that he would suffer disproportionately severe punishment for the military offence on account of … political opinion”. After being deported, war resister Robin Long was sentenced to 15 months in prison, the harshest punishment so far for resisting the Iraq War, partly because of his political statements about the war. Multiple Federal Court of Canada decisions have granted stays of removal on the grounds U.S. war resisters who have spoken out against the war would suffer differential punishment.

Section 171 of the UNHCR Handbook states: “where the type of military action, with whom an individual does not wish to be associated, is condemned by the international community as contrary to basic rules of human conduct, punishment for desertion or draft-evasion could … in itself be regarded as persecution.” This is precisely the position in which Iraq War resisters find themselves, refusing, like Canada under Prime Minister Jean Chretien, to participate in a war condemned by the international community.

Thirdly, while war resisters who have applied for refugee status may be treated the same as every other applicant, the government’s blanket opposition to war resisters as revealed in public comments by Immigration Minister Jason Kenney — who labeled them “bogus refugee claimants” — led the Canadian Council for Refugees to rebuke the Minister because such a statement gives “the strong appearance of political interference” and “threaten claimants’ right to an unbiased decision.”

And to date, where U.S. war resisters have attempted to access the humanitarian and compassionate grounds application process, instead of their claims being decided fairly, the majority of these individuals have received negative decisions that are almost identical word for word.

The final argument of the government is they do not believe in creating a program to allow war resisters to apply for permanent residence. But the majority of Canadians do, and Parliament passed a motion to that effect last June. Rather than listen to Parliament, the government has been deporting war resisters to punishment in the U.S., justifying government actions with a series of false arguments.

It is time for the Conservatives to stop making false claims, and to start respecting the will of Parliament. Iraq War resisters should be allowed to apply for permanent resident status and remain in Canada.

Paul Copeland is a co-founder of the Law Union of Ontario, a previous co-president of the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted and Life Bencher (director) of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

To respond: editor.dailygraphic@shawcable.com or editor@cpheraldleader.com.

3 comments:

M. Yass said...

There's another big argument, one that you missed. It can be summed up in two words:

Recruiters Lie.

In any other life venture, you can rescind a contract that you later find out you were deceived into signing. Not so when your recruiter tells you, for example, that the National Guard never gets deployed. The truth is, the three components of the Army - active, reserve and National Guard - are treated as one. In fact, 60 per cent of the National Guard has been deployed for the maximum amount of time allowed by military regulations.

L-girl said...

That's definitely an important part of the picture. Not sure why you think I missed it... unless you mean Paul Copeland missed it. But "recruiters lie" is an important part of the argument against "they volunteered".

Cornelia said...

I guess the argument was just not in Paul Copeland's article but it has been made before time and again.