Dear President-elect Obama,
My name is Robin Long. I am currently serving a 15-month sentence at a Naval brig in California. I am locked up for refusing to participate in the invasion of the sovereign nation of Iraq, a military action I felt was wrong and an action condemned by most of the international community.
It was illegal and immoral.
My sentence also includes dishonorable discharge. I was no doubt made an example, because not only did I refuse to deploy by going AWOL but I spoke out. I spoke out about the atrocities that are going on over there and also the extensive web of lies the Bush administration told us and Congress, to go over there. I did all of this very openly while AWOL in Canada, where I was making a life for myself.
When I joined the Army in 2003 I felt honored to be serving my country. I was behind the President. I thought it was an honorable venture to be in Iraq. I was convinced by the lies of the Bush administration just like Congress and a majority of Americans. But just because I joined the Army doesn't mean I abdicated my ability to evolve intellectually and morally. When I realized the war in Iraq was a mistake, I saw refusing to fight as my only option. My conscience was screaming at me not to participate.
I feel, like many others, that a government that punishes its citizens for taking a moral stand for humanity and against injustices will lose the faith of its people. The war in Iraq was a Bush administration mistake and my punishment is a product of that mistake and failed policy. Please see that I am being punished for my ideals and morals and for standing up to a giant so my voice could be heard. People can't be afraid to stand up and say "This is wrong, we need change."
You may say I signed a contract. I'd like to quote from a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to George Washington in April of 1793 on his thoughts of contracts and the French Treaties. And I quote, "When performance, for instance, becomes impossible, non-performance is not immoral. So if performance becomes self destructive for the party, the law of self preservation overrules the laws of obligations to others. For the reality of these principals I appeal to the true fountains of evidence, the heart and head of every rational honest man."
For me to continue to participate in my military contract would have been self-destructive to me at my deepest levels of self. It goes against everything I believe in, my ideals and morals. In the case of the invasion of Iraq, international law was broken, as well as violating our own Constitution. Article VI of the Constitution states that any treaty the US is signatory shall be the supreme law of the land. The invasion broke the rules set out for declaring war in the Geneva Convention. And according to the Nuremburg Principles laid out at the Nuremburg Tribunals, I had a higher international duty supported by our Constitution to refuse service in Iraq.
While I was in Canada I had a child. This sentence will have a lasting impact not only on my life but also on the life of my son. My son and his mother are Canadian (not dual citizenship). With a felony conviction (a year plus a day), it will be very difficult for me to re-enter Canada. I would like to live there so I can be in my son's life. Every child needs a father. I want to return to my responsibilities as a father.
This sentence is a great hardship because it has an impact on my life that could last well into the future. This would successfully separate a family. My family needs me, to be a father figure and a financial supporter. My son was born after the fact of me deserting. Please don’t punish him more than I already have by being gone now. I love and miss him and the thought of being reunited with him is helping me get through my time here. I feel I made the right decision by refusing and am more than willing to sit in the brig for my ideals. But I worry about the effect this has on my family.
I ask you to please consider granting me presidential clemency or a pardon. I have given this to many different organizations and people to ensure that you receive a copy. I am so happy that you were elected President. I feel real change coming. You are the light after the storm, "Hurricane Bush," if you will.
If you would like more information on me you can listen to an audio interview on Courage To Resist [scroll down], or read more at Free Robin Long, IVAW or Resisters.ca.
-Robin Long
There's a lot going on at Courage To Resist. Some highlights:
14 comments:
When performance, for instance, becomes impossible, non-performance is not immoral. So if performance becomes self destructive for the party, the law of self preservation overrules the laws of obligations to others. For the reality of these principals I appeal to the true fountains of evidence, the heart and head of every rational honest man.”
And of every honest rational woman, I want to add! I agree 100 %!!! And they knew it already then, unlike the idiots and sadists I came across back then in my past who would have forced women - mostly their abused daughters and daughters in law by moralizing, bullying, degrading treatment and emotional abuse to sign up to nursing them and doing the housework for them whenever they were too indoctrinated and programed to resist or get redress or run away or get it declared legally null and void. And this is a kind of contract where one can actually get legal redress against, until 1 year after getting free from the abusive situation because it was signed under duress and therefore it can be rendered legally null and void. I did not learn that until much later from my lawyer...and finally I knew and I was happy to see that in this case, the very law helps to get vindication!!!
(Even if somebody does not mind the nursing but only if the older person later gets abusive, they can get redress under the law.)
I am sorry but the idiots and offenders and sadists I came across in my past would even have thought forcing somebody at gunpoint - a very obvious kind of duress, right? - would not render any contract null and void. Because they had the guts to impose on me that regarding something which shocked me back then, but makes me see in hindsight most clearly that they were actually forgotten at the denazification. (I would prefer not to have to detail that because it's too unpleasant and nasty!)
Ya know what contracts are very easily rendered null and void over here? When a rich guy makes his wife (either in case she's jobless or he kept her a housewife, usually the latter) sign that on divorce, the welfare can't get any money back from him...
Sorry, that might have been somehow off topic but these were my associations re: the abusive contract thing.
No problem. :)
Thanks for your thoughts.
Thanks so much, Laura, I'm happy to hear that!
I just read some headline on the net that Bush is still "contented with the Iraq war"!! How low and nasty and stupid and freaked-out can it get??? Has he completely lost his marbles or what?! Complete denial and loss of insight, I would say. Loss of insight is not only extremely unpleasant and silly but also to be considered increasing danger of repetition in court and otherwise. Okay, it's extremely unlikely he will ever have to stand trial (although that would be very nice, haha) but re: otherwise, the voters seem to have gotten it and he was voted out of office and proven pay day at the ballot. At least that...But it shocked me how well his denial works. There was some Nazi offender who was said to be suffering (or rather whose around him) from "a pathological lack of memory and a pathologically sane conscience". From my experience with offenders's strategies, this point applies not only to that awful felon criminal who has unfortunately never been in the dock himself due to some legal loophole and his crimes being discovered after statute of limitations for mere homicide (as opposed to murder and some people who have been forgotten at the denazification would certainly have ruled only homicide could apply, whereas I would have argued for murder on base motives and would have tried for cruelty as well!) but he has kicked the pail in the meantime...as one can say, the problem with old Nazis is being biologically sorted...Briefly, it's shocking time and again how so many offenders show a total lack of insight that what they did was wrong.
I just read some headline on the net that Bush is still "contented with the Iraq war"!!
Well, why not? He got everything he wanted from a compliant Congress, his incredibly rich friends got even richer, and he didn't suffer at all. I'm sure he didn't lose a moment's sleep over it.
Has he completely lost his marbles or what?! Complete denial and loss of insight, I would say.
To a normal person, yes, Iraq looks bad.
But the invasion and occupation has gone the way they WANTED it to go. Shortage of troops, no armor, no plans to leave -- it is all by design. They are not dumb. This is what they want to happen.
I cannot state it strongly enough: Iraq has been a huge success for them. They have access to oil and their business friends have made billions and billions and billions of dollars. And there has been very little outcry about the 4,500 dead US troops. Plus, all of them will get away with it.
It's the perfect crime.
I see. Thanks for the info and clarification on his political orientation, Laura and Redsock. It doesn't bother him at all and he doesn't care about the hardships caused by the people for it and the failure in terms of bringing democracy. Financially, it paid off for him and his rich accomplices and that's all that matters to him. That shows once again how he is and thinks as a politician and as a person! Awful and extremely exploitative and ruthless, right?
Plus, all of them will get away with it.
It's the perfect crime.
Sure, I agree! Awful!!
the failure in terms of bringing democracy
That was never a goal. They don't give a shit about democracy anywhere else in the world -- democracy is merely an obstacle between them and what they want. That was simply a PR lie to sell the invasion.
Remember, bringing democracy was only the reason after the non-existent WMDs couldn't be found.
Remember, bringing democracy was only the reason after the non-existent WMDs couldn't be found.
Thanks, Laura. He definitely needed a pretext and some propaganda, I see. I think Vietnam was also started by some misinformation re the alleged Gulf of Tonkin incident, right? I think Lyndon B. Johnson (the bathroom freak) and Co. claimed their navy had been attacked over there and it was not true, right?
Democracy is merely an obstacle between them and what they want.
Obviously he can't be interested in democracy. That's evident from what he has been up to!
I think Vietnam was also started by some misinformation re the alleged Gulf of Tonkin incident, right? I think Lyndon B. Johnson (the bathroom freak) and Co. claimed their navy had been attacked over there and it was not true, right?
The US engineered the incident, then exaggerated it, as a pretext to overthrow the government there. The war began very slowly and quietly, first under Kennedy, then Johnson and Nixon continued to escalate it.
Fake incidents where US territory was allegedly attacked has been used as a pretext for war throughout US history.
You might be interested in the book "Overthrow" by Stephen Kinzer, which is an overview of a number of these incidents, beginning with Hawaii (once an independent nation) and ending with Iraq. I blogged about it several times - look under the category "what I'm reading".
Many of us look at 9/11 that way, too. NOT that I want to get into that in this thread :) but it fits the pattern perfectly.
The US engineered the incident, then exaggerated it, as a pretext to overthrow the government there. The war began very slowly and quietly, first under Kennedy, then Johnson and Nixon continued to escalate it.
Definitely! I think it's even stated in the autobiographies by Bill and Hillary Clinton, kind of. However, I found it quite unnecessary for Bill Clinton to write that if he had not had expert knowledge on the bogus war thing from his job with a politician (sorry, I don't remember the name right now), maybe he would have felt less reluctant towards the damn thing and he might have been less inclined to avoid it. I can see that was probably intended for the conservative swing voters but from my perspective, that stuff was more than unnecessary and re: how the whole trouble freaked him out emotionally to the utmost, personally, I found that more than regretful and I wished for him to be able to maintain boundaries better, haha (as I have been wishing for so many people, sometimes unfortunately including myself, re: so many different situations and stuff, so this is far from being specific in any way, haha)! But that's just how I feel. Not everybody perceives things the same way. I just had the impression that both Bill and Hillary had sometimes unfortunately bought into some conservative trash (and I don't just mean their obvious political mistakes when they did not stand up politically to some very detrimental Republican stuff time and again! I know and I don't like that either. I am well aware that Hillary did unfortunately vote for the resolution enabling Bush to wage the Iraq war, much as I regret it.) where it had a very negative impact on themselves, I mean emotionally and sometimes maybe even limiting their options for themselves and re: maintaining their boundaries and standing their ground for them personally. Okay, I guess I am just the type of person who feels very comfortable saying that power and money are actually very nice things but one needn't (and shouldn't) do everything for it. Of course, I know doing bad abusive stuff is not okay and not acceptable but this is not the point I am trying to make right now. I mean much more, I would not in any way ever in any election campaign or otherwise put up with reactionary and / or even sexist demands of any kind. If some journalists want info on cookies, they can ask somebody else who knows. If they merely want to impose their patriarchal stuff about pushing women to become housewives regardless of what they want for themselves, no way!!! If this entails that I can't have a top position but just some other ways of having success and fun and getting recognition and being able to help and make a contribution to progressive policies, I have no problem with that. I would just not cater to the Republicans and any similar ones! And of course, Violence Protection Act and better social security over here help to be independent, too. I just think it's sad and regrettable for people to buy so much into all that reactionary and backward and often also sexist stereotyping and as for myself, I would neither do it nor advise it.
Post a Comment