2.08.2008

the plague of nationalism

From Chris Hedges's War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, from a chapter titled "The Plague of Nationalism":
The military junta that ruled Argentina, and was responsible for killing 20,000 of its own citizens during the "Dirty War," in 1982 invaded the Falkland Islands, which the Argentines called the Malvinas. The junta, which had been on the verge of collapse and beset by violent street demonstrations and nationwide strikes in the weeks before the war, instantly became the saviors of the country. Labor unions and opposition leaders, some of whom were still visibly bruised from beatings, were hauled out of jail cells before cameras to repeat what was a collective mantra: "Las Malvinas son Argentinas."

The invasion transformed the country. Reality was replaced with a wild and self-serving fiction, a legitimization of the worst prejudices of the masses and paranoia of the outside world. The secret interior world arrayed against Argentina became one of strange cabals, worldwide Jewry trotted out again to be beaten like an old horse, vast subterranean webs that had as their focus the destruction of the Argentine people. The exterior world was exemplified by the nation. All that was noble and good was embodied, like some unique gene, in the Argentine people. Stories of the heroism of the Argentine military - whose singular recent accomplishment was the savage repression of its own people - filled the airwaves.

Friends of mine, who a few days earlier had excoriated the dictatorship, now bragged about the prowess of Argentine commanders. One general, during a dispute with Chile, flew his helicopter over the Chilean border in order to piss on Chilean soil. This story was repeated with evident pride. Cars raced through the streets honking horns and waving the blue and white Argentine flag. Argentines burst into the national anthem and ecstatic cheering at sports events. The large Anglo-Argentine community sent delegations to Britain to lobby for the junta.

I had spent nights with Argentine friends talking of a new Argentina, one that would respect human rights, allow basic freedoms, and perhaps put on the trial the generals responsible for the Dirty War. Now such talk was an anathema, even treasonous. On the street any dissent, espeically from a foreigner, could mean physical violence. Any suggestion that the invasion was not just and correct and glorious was unpalatable. One never referred to the islands by their English name. Overweeing pride and a sense of national solidarity swept through the city like an electric current. It was as if I had woken up, like one of Kafka's characters, and found myself transformed into a bug. I would come to feel this way in every nation at war, including in the United States after the attacks of September 11.

This was my first taste of nationalist triumphalism in wartime. There was almost no one I could speak with. A populace that had agitated for change now outdid itself to lionize uniformed killers. All bowed before the state. It taught me a crucial lesson that I would carry into every other conflict. Lurking beneath the surface of every society, including ours, is the passionate yearning for a nationalist cause that exalts us, the kind that war alone is able to deliver. It reduces and at times erases the anxiety of individual consciousness. We abandon individual responsbility for a shared, unquestioned communal enterprise, however morally dubious.

I found this very illuminating. And very familiar.

7 comments:

Lone Primate said...

Even here, even with this stupid little war in Afghanistan, some pimply non-voter in Alberta can psychologically blackmail the Premier of Ontario into renaming part of the 401 as "the Highway of Heroes", and other military supporters can put ongoing pressure on the administration of the City of Toronto to rename the Don Valley Parkway "the Veterans Memorial Highway", and call it "a slap in the face" when the city is first mute on the idea, and then respectfully declines with reasons. Yet uncomfortable the mayor must have been... but why should he be?

L-girl said...

Yes, and that in Canada, which is not very nationalistic by global standards.

Wild English Rose said...

Thanks for posting this L-girl. Probably my earliest memory of an international event is the Falklands war. My mother took me down to the docks to see the expeditionary force leave, although at the time I think I was under the impression that the Falklands and the Isle of Wight were one and the same place! It is interesting that the invasion - when it failed - probably contributed to the fall of the right wing regime in Argentina and the continuation of the right wing government in the UK, which might well have lost the 1983 election under other circumstances. All this is a lengthy preambule to saying that you might be interested in a book called 'Los Chicos de la Guerra' which is available in English translation, although I think out of print. It is a series of interviews with some of the very young, mostly conscript, soldiers who were part of the Argentine force. It gives a very interesting insight into life in Argentina during that period. Unfortunately it seems to be among the substantial collection books I left behind in the UK so I am afraid the description is rather sketchy....

L-girl said...

WER, thanks for sharing that.

It is interesting that the invasion - when it failed - probably contributed to the fall of the right wing regime in Argentina and the continuation of the right wing government in the UK, which might well have lost the 1983 election under other circumstances.

I always think of the Falklands War as a scheme to keep the Thatcher govt in power. I've rarely thought about it from the Argentine POV, so this was particularly interesting to me.

redsock said...

Speaking of Thatcher:

The Sunday Times
January 27, 2008

Margaret Thatcher ordered the Royal Navy to land Special Boat Service (SBS) frogmen on the coast of Sweden from British submarines pretending to be Soviet vessels, a new book has claimed.

The deception ... [was] designed to heighten the impression around the world of the Soviet Union as an aggressive superpower ... [and was] carried out by the British and American navies. ...

****

deang said...

I always think of the Falklands War as a scheme to keep the Thatcher govt in power.

Naomi Klein documents in The Shock Doctrine that this was exactly the effect (and probably the intent) of Thatcher declaring war on Argentina. Her poll numbers were tanking before, but they soared as soon as she went aggressively martial.

L-girl said...

It's very sad that a war should have such an effect on a populace.