Of course the homes of Mississauga Road are shacks compared to many wealthier areas. On the front page of the New York Times online, I happened to notice an item from the Real Estate section, about the burst of mansion-building in Beverly Hills, where 11,000 square feet is considered cozy. In New York City, excessive wealth is a little more hidden, in penthouse apartments overlooking Central Park, although not, I would imagine, in the owners' second and third homes.
Contrast this with a recent report from what's left of the city of New Orleans.
Katrina shocks New Orleans visitors 10 months onHere are snips from the discussion that followed when the above story was posted at Democratic Underground:
Bill Friend thought he was ready to go home again. He had read the newspapers, watched TV and talked with friends about the devastation wreaked on New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina.
Still, he was shocked.
"You go down street after street after street and see nothing -- wreckage," said Friend, 80, who grew up in New Orleans and now lives in the Washington area. "The overall impression of it is how much of it there is."
Katrina hit New Orleans on Aug. 29, flooding 80 percent of the city and killing more than 1,500 from Louisiana in one of the worst natural disasters the country has seen. So far, only about half the population has returned and vast stretches of the city are nearly deserted and still full of debris.
[from post] My son was in NO in Feb. He said the devastation was worse than anything you could imagine, FAR, FAR WORSE THAN WHAT YOU SEE ON TV. He brought home pictures...pictures that he took while driving through...miles and miles of nothing but wreckage...total wreckage, like a bomb had destroyed the entire city.I mentioned recently that I'm reading Collapse, by Jared Diamond. In failing societies, it seems the elite continued to spend lavishly, often competitively, while the common people struggled and scraped for resources that were increasingly scarce. In ancient societies, as today, lavish spending often was expressed by building. In ancient Mexico, the Mayan elite built more and more elaborate temples, while farms were failing and warfare for ever-dwindling resources was raging. On Easter Island the elite were still competing to build larger and larger statues, while the people were starving to death.
[from post] I was in New Orleans last month. I agree, nothing on tv prepares you for the destruction. I was shocked that so much was still in shambles. I guess having a pile of debris in front of a house is a good sign - at least the house has been cleared out. The houses still piled with stuff, wet moldy, decaying stuff, are where the problem is. Families are away or can't bring themselves to gut the houses. Even on Canal St there were burned our businesses, unopened businesses, boarded up hotels and shopping areas. A City of New Orleans building was boarded up and still damaged. Words cannot describe the devastation that still exists.
16 comments:
I have to admit, I think we saw the clay feet of the statue last year at last. The US can project military power pretty much anywhere in the world (where the opposition doesn't have the bomb), but couldn't muster the will in 40 years to rebuild the levees as per the Army Corps of Engineers' instructions, and now can't find the will or the resources to rebuild just one of its cities hit by a natural disaster, and one not entirely out of keeping with the history of the place at that. There's something wrong with a family that drives Beamers but feeds the kids baloney sandwiches.
There's something wrong with a family that drives Beamers but feeds the kids baloney sandwiches.
For sure - and well said.
In this case, however, as far as Jared Diamond's parallels go, that family is all the wealthy nations on the planet. Since we're all so interdependent (eg, valuable, finite resources coming from halfway around the globe), if one powerful society collapses, they may pull the rest of us down with it.
"couldn't muster the will" ?
I think it's more like "didn't care enough to muster the will" -- there's no money in maintaining civil engineering projects in the United States, so nobody in the ruling class gives a damn about them. The rich people in New Orleans all live up above sea level, so why should they care about the people who lived in the swamplands?
I think that the ultimate goal of the rich in the United States is to remake the country as an anglo version of pre-Chavez Venezuela. If you're inside one of the walled suburbs, does it really matter if the underclass is paying rent to live on a garbage dump?
Hiya and GREAT post. Thanks for giving a shit. I posted recently on my blog about this very subject and am VERY happy people aren't letting it die out.
The main thing they, the powers that be, keep saying is "Well why rebuild, it's going to happen again?!" Well the plain states flood YEARLY, Florida is hit by Hurricanes YEARLY and the fires in the southwest are devestating YEARLY. We rebuild these areas, so why not New Orleans.
You said it correctly when you identified the class system here as being a major fault. But unfortunatly, it also comes down to a race factor here. In the good ol US, they all like to think that there are no racial divides anymore, but it simply isn't true. There are DEEP racial divides. Just look at the overwhelming black population in our prisons.
But again, thank you so much for a great post... I hope you visit the one I posted. :D
I think it's more like "didn't care enough to muster the will"
But that's what will is. You either muster it or you don't. It's not "couldn't afford it" or "didn't have the money" - it's "didn't muster the will", which means they didn't give a shit.
I think that the ultimate goal of the rich in the United States is to remake the country as an anglo version of pre-Chavez Venezuela.
Whether or not it's their goal, it will be the end result.
LadyCelticFire, thank you for your feedback, and thank you for caring, too. I agree that race plays as much a part as class. Often they're the same thing, but they're not identical - and both are factors - no matter how much Americans want to cover their eyes, stop up their ears, and pretend it isn't so.
I'll definitely stop by to see your post. Thanks again!
I think that the ultimate goal of the rich in the United States is to remake the country as an anglo version of pre-Chavez Venezuela. If you're inside one of the walled suburbs, does it really matter if the underclass is paying rent to live on a garbage dump?
Shades of Snow Crash
The story takes place in a fractured America around the end of the 20th century, in which corporatization, franchising, and the economy in general have spun wildly out of control. Snow Crash depicts the absence of a central powerful state; in its place, corporations have taken over the traditional roles of government, including dispute resolution and national defense. The United States has lost most of its territory in the wake of an economic collapse; the residual remains of the federal government are weak and inefficient and are often used by Stephenson for comic relief.
Much of the territory lost by the government has been carved up into a huge number of sovereign enclaves, each run by its own big business franchise (such as "Mr. Lee's Greater Hong Kong" or the various residential burbclaves (suburb enclaves)). This arrangement bears a similarity to anarcho-capitalism, a theme Stephenson carries over to his next novel The Diamond Age. Hyperinflation has devalued the dollar to the extent that trillion dollar bills, Ed Meeses, are little regarded and the quadrillion dollar note, a Gipper, is the standard 'small' bill. For large transactions, people resort to alternative, non-hyperinflated currencies like yen or "Kongbucks" (the official currency of Mr. Lee's Greater Hong Kong).
To be honest, though, there are some good reasons to reconsider rebuilding NO as and where it is. For most of a century now, the US Army's been waging a war on the Mississippi River that, sooner or later, it has to lose. For a long time, the river's been working to change its course to assume the track of the Atchafalaya River (throughout its history, it's had dozens of different courses to the Gulf). When that happens, as sooner or later it must, it's going to rob NO of much of its drinking water and its commercial activity... it will end up, out of necessity, a much smaller city anyway. I think the US should begin transferring people and industries to Morgan City, which is on the Atchafalaya, and building it up to be the new NO, and then taking the restraints off the river to let nature take its course. Hurricane Katrina was no blessing, but given that it did happen, it does furnish the US with a opportunity to consider the future of NO and what's best for its people in the long run.
to consider the future of NO and what's best for its people in the long run.
Hmm. You know you're talking about the US, right? And Louisiana? One of the most corrupt states in the country?
Louisiana has never considered what's best for its people, and the US's contempt and disregard for its people were on full display before, after and during Katrina. Given the realities of life down there, a planned relocation like this is a fantasy.
Me: I think it's more like "didn't care enough to muster the will"
L-girl: But that's what will is.
Sure, but I hate the passive voice. I always want to emphasise that it's all because of the money, and there are active efforts to steer government funds towards projects that generate the largest kickbacks. It's part of the kinder & gentler raving lunatic image I'm trying to project.
If I had any influence at all, I'd be pushing vigorously for removing all of the levees (and navigation canals) except for the ones that protect New Orleans and the surrounding suburbs. There's a lot of delta that needs to be rebuilt and the only way that's going to happen is if the river gets to dump sediment on them for several dozen years. (And after that, I'd have the river levees around New Orleans lowered or bulldozed so that the city could get some of that fill too.)
Sure, but I hate the passive voice. I always want to emphasise that it's all because of the money, and there are active efforts to steer government funds towards projects that generate the largest kickbacks.
Worth emphasizing - a worthy goal.
Anyone who's still reading this thread, I'd like to point you to Lady CelticFire's post about not rebuilding New Orleans.
Louisiana has never considered what's best for its people, and the US's contempt and disregard for its people were on full display before, after and during Katrina. Given the realities of life down there, a planned relocation like this is a fantasy.
The government making people move off their private property? You'd be asking for an armed rebellion chock-full of denunciations of the UN and its black helicopters.
The government making people move off their private property? You'd be asking for an armed rebellion chock-full of denunciations of the UN and its black helicopters.
I don't see where free choice doesn't enter into it. "Folks, we've got nice new homes under construction in Morgan City, and we're spending the money to help companies X, Y, and Z move there. But we ain't paying to rebuild here. There's no future in it. It's up to you; decide if your interests lie in a fresh start and a good job, or fighting with the rats over who gets the typhoid. Your call." Some will stay; best of luck to them. I think most people have sense to leave Love Canal if they're given the means.
It's a nice idea, but relocations in the US don't generally proceed in such an enlightened fashion.
Post a Comment